2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl090249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of CO2 Outgassing by Gas Bubbles Under a Hurricane

Abstract: The role of gas bubbles on the air-sea CO 2 flux during Hurricane Frances (2004) is studied using a large-eddy simulation model that couples ocean surface boundary layer turbulence, gas bubbles, and dissolved gases. In the subtropical surface ocean where gases are slightly supersaturated, gases in bubbles can still dissolve due to hydrostatic pressure and surface tension exerted on bubbles. Under the simulated conditions, the CO 2 efflux with an explicit bubble effect is less than 2% of that calculated using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With constant I = 0.15, Equation ( 14) and Equation ( 16) can be used to approximate unbiased f(U), and k considering differences in Sc for CO2 and other gases (see [33] for Sc of other gases). The same f(U) parameterization for all slightly soluble gases may not be realistic for gases with differing solubilities [55][56][57], but this inquiry is better kept for the future. The newly proposed corrections were compared to three commonly used methods (listed in Table 2) when adjusting wind variability-induced bias in k for wind speeds sampled at a resolution of 0.5° × 0.5° spatially and temporally monthly.…”
Section: Comparison Of Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With constant I = 0.15, Equation ( 14) and Equation ( 16) can be used to approximate unbiased f(U), and k considering differences in Sc for CO2 and other gases (see [33] for Sc of other gases). The same f(U) parameterization for all slightly soluble gases may not be realistic for gases with differing solubilities [55][56][57], but this inquiry is better kept for the future. The newly proposed corrections were compared to three commonly used methods (listed in Table 2) when adjusting wind variability-induced bias in k for wind speeds sampled at a resolution of 0.5° × 0.5° spatially and temporally monthly.…”
Section: Comparison Of Correction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the flattening of the fluxes and steady state saturation anomalies at very high wind speeds might not occur if deep bubbles were present and could transfer large amounts of gas since deep bubbles provide a mechanism for enhanced bubble injection when shallow bubble injection reaches a maximum. Thus, it is imperative for more field observations of gas fluxes and steady state saturation anomalies in high wind conditions (such as work by Liang et al [2020] and McNeil and D'Asaro [2007] on measurements collected autonomously in typhoons). Thus, the main power of this study is that it points to intriguing behavior that should be tested in the real ocean (i.e., the flattening of the fluxes and steady state saturation anomalies) as well as key variables (significant wave height, wave steepness, and wave dependent Reynolds number) that should be further studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the gas transfer velocities estimated using k D18 are in good agreement with eddy covariance field measurements for U in the range of 0–25 m s −1 . Hence, the k D18 may indirectly include bubble‐induced supersaturation effect though it remains unclear whether the equation derived in CO 2 sink regions can be applied in CO 2 source regions (Liang et al., 2020). Second, time‐averaged U products can introduce some biases in all k due to the non‐linear relation between U and k (Wanninkhof, 2002), a topic that is better kept for a future inquiry.…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the k D18 and k W14 expressions do not explicitly consider bubble-induced supersaturation. Using Large Eddy Simulations coupled with bubble dynamics and a transport model, Liang et al (2020) showed that bubble supersaturation under hurricane conditions can substantially suppress CO 2 outgassing. It is difficult to extrapolate their results here as hurricane winds commence at 33 m s −1 , while 99% of the HW considered here are in the range of 15-18 m s −1 (Figure S5a).…”
Section: Caveats and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation