2019
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2019.2891707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Cross-Band Scattering in Multiband Antenna Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the LB and UB antennas in [10] are singlepolarized antennas and the array layout cannot be implemented into dual-polarized antenna arrays. Similarly, four HB antenna elements achieve shared-aperture working property with one LB antenna in [17]. However, the bandwidth of the LB antenna is very limited due to the radiation patches of the LB dipole are fragmented to reduce the mutual coupling with the HB antennas.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Dual-band Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the LB and UB antennas in [10] are singlepolarized antennas and the array layout cannot be implemented into dual-polarized antenna arrays. Similarly, four HB antenna elements achieve shared-aperture working property with one LB antenna in [17]. However, the bandwidth of the LB antenna is very limited due to the radiation patches of the LB dipole are fragmented to reduce the mutual coupling with the HB antennas.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Dual-band Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the embedded layout is hard to be applied in this work since the higher band antenna array is a planar antenna array and the frequency ratio between two bands is 5. To achieve dual-band planar antenna array configuration, multiband antenna element [16] and fragmenting dipole element [17] are proposed in the literature. However, the multiband antenna element could not maintain stable radiation patterns in higher frequency bands (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Array aperture miniaturization refers to miniaturizing the total occupied area of an antenna array by reducing or reusing the aperture. Some typical methods in this regard include nested antenna scheme, 5 current choke, 6 and frequency selective surface (FSS) 7 . Last, radiator miniaturization refers to reducing the radiator size of an antenna element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], the presented filtering antenna element can improve the port isolation due to its high out-of-band radiation rejection characteristic, in which the radiation of the high band (HB) subarray is suppressed in the low band (LB) and vice versa. Choke radiators are also used to suppress the mutual coupling between low band and high band base station antennas [25]. While in [26], frequency selective surface (FSS) are used to solve the coupling issue whose scenario is similar to that in [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choke radiators are also used to suppress the mutual coupling between low band and high band base station antennas [25]. While in [26], frequency selective surface (FSS) are used to solve the coupling issue whose scenario is similar to that in [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%