1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.40.771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression ofωciInstability in a Mirror-Confined Plasma by Injection of an Electron Beam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though later evidence would somewhat modify the details of the explanation, the general picture of the role of warm ions in suppressing microinstability in the 2XIIB experiment has continued to be borne out. This result, and those that preceded or followed it in experiments such as PR-6 or Constance I (MIT) [76], represent one of the cornerstones of the physics of mirror plasma confinement.…”
Section: Fig 10 Experimentally Measured M Versus Average Ion Energy I...mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Though later evidence would somewhat modify the details of the explanation, the general picture of the role of warm ions in suppressing microinstability in the 2XIIB experiment has continued to be borne out. This result, and those that preceded or followed it in experiments such as PR-6 or Constance I (MIT) [76], represent one of the cornerstones of the physics of mirror plasma confinement.…”
Section: Fig 10 Experimentally Measured M Versus Average Ion Energy I...mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The original goal of the Constance 2 experiments was to investigate the "mechanism of hot electron statbilization, reported in the experiments of loffe, el al., 1975, Klinkowstein and Smullin, 1978 The hope was that by repeating the conditions under which -beam and ECRH stabilization was observed, the superior diagnostics of Constance 2 would be able to measure the electron population present during stabilization. One of the key issues to be determined by the experiments was whether or not a wtrapped electron population depressed the potential, confining cool ions and stabilizing loss-cone instabilities or whether "some other mechanism" (such as hot-electron driven turbulence) was responsible for the observed stabilization.…”
Section: Comments On Hot Electron Stablization Of Dclcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is imperative to control this instability for the mirror confinement schemes to be successful. In a recent experiment, Klinkowstein and Smullin [3] have reported an interesting technique to suppress the instability, which consists in injecting an electron beam into the machine along the magnetic field lines. It has been found that it led to the suppression of the instability when the beam power in their experiment was greater than about 42 kW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%