1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.r7833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of Zeeman splitting in a GaAs quantum dot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also define for the sake of convenience a parameter which is proportional to the magnetic field strength. One can see that 1 γ  = 0.47226 B ( T ) 22,26 . Figure 1 shows the distribution of the electron and hole of an exciton in a GaAs QD.…”
Section: Gs Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We also define for the sake of convenience a parameter which is proportional to the magnetic field strength. One can see that 1 γ  = 0.47226 B ( T ) 22,26 . Figure 1 shows the distribution of the electron and hole of an exciton in a GaAs QD.…”
Section: Gs Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We will now study the Dirac equation (10) in the background of metric (1). Let us write the null tetrad basis vectors of the null tetrad as…”
Section: Dirac Equation In Sebhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the behaviour of a spin-1/2 particle in different backgrounds has been studied by many authors [8][9][10]. Similarly, the behaviour of a spin-1/2 particle around a charged black hole is studied by Mukhopadhyay [11], where he studied the behaviour of the potential by varying the charge of the black hole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, multi-electrons QD problem with the e-e interaction does not recognize exactly theoretical solution. Thus, many analytical methods and numerical approximations have been adopted to explore and study a multi-electrons QD problem (Beenakker, 1991;Oaknin, Palacios, Brey, & Tejedor, 1994;Johnson & Reina, 1992;Reusch & Grabert, 2003;Emperador, Lipparini, & Serra, 2006;McEuen, Foxman, Kinaret, Meirav, Kastner, Wingreen, & Wind, 1992;Harju, Sverdlov, Nieminen, & Halonen, 1999;Ferconi & Vignale, 1994;Cipriani, Rosa-Clot, & Taddei, 2000;Mukhopadhyay & Chatterjee, 2000;Harju, Sverdlov, Barbiellini, & Nieminen, 1998;Mukhopadhyay & Chatterjee, 1999a, 1999bLiu et al, 2017). While a portion of these techniques are excessively shortsighted, making it impossible to catch the fundamental features of QDs, some are limited just to the ground energy levels, some ignore to incorporate the correlation and exchange effects legitimately, some are unable to manage and work with high electron density and large magnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%