2020
DOI: 10.46298/epiga.2020.volume4.5436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sur l'existence du sch\'ema en groupes fondametal

Abstract: Let $S$ be a Dedekind scheme, $X$ a connected $S$-scheme locally of finite type and $x\in X(S)$ a section. The aim of the present paper is to establish the existence of the fundamental group scheme of $X$, when $X$ has reduced fibers or when $X$ is normal. We also prove the existence of a group scheme, that we will call the quasi-finite fundamental group scheme of $X$ at $x$, which classifies all the quasi-finite torsors over $X$, pointed over $x$. We define Galois torsors, which play in this context a role si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notation cannot lead to any ambiguity as the two operations of taking the prime to p quotient and reducing to the generic fiber are interchangeable. That the morphism ψ (p ) is faithfully flat is, again, a consequence of [5,Proposition 5.5]. In order to prove that it is an isomorphism it is thus sufficient to prove that it is a closed immersion.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notation cannot lead to any ambiguity as the two operations of taking the prime to p quotient and reducing to the generic fiber are interchangeable. That the morphism ψ (p ) is faithfully flat is, again, a consequence of [5,Proposition 5.5]. In order to prove that it is an isomorphism it is thus sufficient to prove that it is a closed immersion.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In few words we prove that in order for the torsor Y → X K to be extended to X it is sufficient (and uninterestingly necessary) to extend it with a finite and faithfully flat morphism T → X with some few extra assumptions which are often satisfied even when T → X is not a torsor. To show the usefulness of our criterion we will provide an interesting application of our main result to the base change behavior of the fundamental group scheme, as defined in [12], [13] and [5] (cf. also [10] for a more recent construction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let A be a discrete valuation ring and X a projective flat A-scheme carrying an A-point x 0 . There has been some interest in constructing an affine and flat group scheme Π(X, x 0 ) over A with the property that morphisms to finite and flat group schemes Π(X, x 0 ) → G should canonically correspond to pointed G-torsors over X; see [Gas03,AEG20,MS13]. This is an analogue of Nori's theory [Nor76] (Nori deals with a base field ) and hence can be developed through (SS) a Tannakian category of semi-stable vector bundles [Nor76, Definition after Lemma 3.6], (F) the construction of fibre products of torsors [Nor82,Definition II.2] or (T) a Tannakian category of vector bundles trivialized by proper and surjective morphisms [BdS11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers [Gas03] and [AEG20] follow (F), and [MS13] follows a variant of (SS). That is to say, [Gas03] and [AEG20] construct Π(X, x 0 ) by producing a universal Π(X, x 0 )-torsor X → X, and this is achieved by filtering the category of torsors under finite group schemes [AEG20,Theorem 4.2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation