Sürdürülebilir Mimarlık Kapsamında Ekolojik Bina ve Enerji Etkin Binanın Basit Toplamlı Ağırlıklandırma Yöntemi ile Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Factors such as rapidly increasing urbanization, increasing energy need and uncontrolled construction after the Industrial Revolution cause rapid consumption of resources. The increase in uncontrolled consumption leads to air and environmental pollution, an increase in ecological footprint and climatic changes. The consequences of global warming have begun to be seen tangibly. At the same time, it is revealed by the researches that it will be difficult to meet even the current need, which is very difficult to transfer energy resources to future generations. The concept of sustainability has gained importance in terms of efficient use of resources and transferring them to future generations in the face of this consumption, and has become a research topic of many different disciplines. Studies on sustainability, which has a wide scope from political-economic policies to energy resources, production, social structure and architecture, continue. The discipline of architecture also advances by adopting sustainable architecture approaches as a step in the steps to be taken for a sustainable world. This research study aims to contribute to the literature by considering the principles of ecological building and energy efficient building, from the concept of sustainability to sustainable architecture approaches. Basically, the aim is to try to understand the place of ecological building and energy efficient building concepts and principles within the concept and principles of sustainable architecture. Ecological Building and Energy Efficient Building were compared using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in line with the main principles of "Resource Management", "Life Cycle Design" and "Design for Quality of Life" within the scope of Sustainable Architecture. While the weight values were found with the Simple Additive Weight Method, which is a preferred method because it is mathematically simple and gives objective results, the principles of "Resource Management", "Life Cycle Design" and "Design for Quality of Life" were given a fixed value. While giving this value, the number 12, which is the common multiple of these numbers, was determined since there were 4-3-3 strategies belonging to 3 principles. After determining the total score for each alternative, a value was obtained by dividing the criteria of each strategy by this fixed number.