2007
DOI: 10.1080/00218460701751814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Activation and Adhesion Properties of Wood-Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Timber's unique characteristics, like wood porosity, lumen penetration, and the complex chemistry of wood, including the effect of extractives, makes the wood adhesion phenomenon all the more complex [7][8][9][10][11][12] and general theories of bond formation can not explain the difference between a durable and a non-durable bond. In addition, while surface activation may be sufficient to improve both short-term adhesion and durability of bonded joints with non-cellulosic adherends [13,14], and to improve short-term adhesion of certain adhesives to timber [4,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], facing the results obtained here it seems that in the case of wood adherends the simple fact of activating the timber surface does not translate directly into an improvement of the bonded joint durability. Epoxies and most other in situ polymerised adhesives generate polymers with a high degree of chain cross-linking and very limited flexibility, which serve well in providing adhesive bonds with the creep resistance required for structural timber bonds [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timber's unique characteristics, like wood porosity, lumen penetration, and the complex chemistry of wood, including the effect of extractives, makes the wood adhesion phenomenon all the more complex [7][8][9][10][11][12] and general theories of bond formation can not explain the difference between a durable and a non-durable bond. In addition, while surface activation may be sufficient to improve both short-term adhesion and durability of bonded joints with non-cellulosic adherends [13,14], and to improve short-term adhesion of certain adhesives to timber [4,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], facing the results obtained here it seems that in the case of wood adherends the simple fact of activating the timber surface does not translate directly into an improvement of the bonded joint durability. Epoxies and most other in situ polymerised adhesives generate polymers with a high degree of chain cross-linking and very limited flexibility, which serve well in providing adhesive bonds with the creep resistance required for structural timber bonds [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, process control is a critical aspect and the final surface modifications strongly depend on it [123]. This method is also applied to impart reactive groups on the polymeric surface and to promote polymer adhesion [9,[129][130][131]. In polyethylene-lignocellulosic composites, Felix et al [132], studied the modification of cellulose fibres with oxygen plasma and characterised the interface in the system cellulose with LLDPE.…”
Section: Chemical Pre-treatments Of Lignocellulosic Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma treatment [7,8], corona discharge treatment [9], flame treatment [10], and chromic acid treatment [11] have been demonstrated to effectively improve the surface free energy and surface wettability of WPCs. However, these treatments demand harsh modification conditions, relatively high cost, and complex operational processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%