2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface alteration of human tooth enamel subjected to acidic and neutral 30% hydrogen peroxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
104
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
14
104
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…11 It was found that acidic and neutral 30% HP solutions had the same whitening efficiency while acidic 30% HP solution caused more deleterious effects on enamel than the neutral one. This finding indicated that the enamel surface demineralisation might be mainly caused by the low pH rather than HP per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 It was found that acidic and neutral 30% HP solutions had the same whitening efficiency while acidic 30% HP solution caused more deleterious effects on enamel than the neutral one. This finding indicated that the enamel surface demineralisation might be mainly caused by the low pH rather than HP per se.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, the majority of them paid attention to the concentration, application modes or treating time of bleaching agents. 1,[8][9][10] Only a limited number of studies 11 focused on the pH values. It is known that the low pH could induce the demineralisation of enamel structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For crowns and veneers, these treatment options entail a moderate loss of dental hard tissue. Vital tooth bleaching is not only a less costly alternative to bonded restorative dentistry, it is a conservative and non-invasive technique which has been well accepted to be safe and effective 2) . Tooth bleaching using oxalic acid was first introduced in 1848 3) , followed by hydrogen peroxide (HP) in 1884 4) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, some authors consider the pH of the product to be more important than HP concentration in conditioning the changes in morphology and roughness. [30][31][32][33] Regarding the concentration of the products, some authors have only described morphological changes or variations in the mineral component when using high concentration gels, [34][35][36] while others have recorded changes even with products at low concentrations. 37,38 In turn, some investigators have observed no changes when using HP at a concentration of 7.5% or CP at a concentration of 10 or 16%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%