2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00445-004-0370-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface area, porosity and water adsorption properties of fine volcanic ash particles

Abstract: Our understanding on how ash particles in volcanic plumes react with coexisting gases and aerosols is still rudimentary, despite the importance of these reactions in influencing the chemistry and dynamics of a plume. In this study, six samples of fine ash (<100 mm) from different volcanoes were measured for their specific surface area, a s , porosity and water adsorption properties with the aim to provide insights into the capacity of silicate ash particles to react with gases, including water vapour. To do so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
9
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this plot, we estimate the total number concentration near the vent to be approximately 10 12 particles per cubic centimeter having a total surface area of ash of 45 cm 2 cm −3 . According to previous studies, the specific surface area of fine volcanic ash is in the range 0.2-2.1 m 2 g −1 (Delmelle et al, 2005;Mills and Rose, 2010). We find 0.9 m 2 g −1 as the specific surface area of the fine ash in this study, which is well within the range mentioned above.…”
Section: Size Distribution Of the Ashsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this plot, we estimate the total number concentration near the vent to be approximately 10 12 particles per cubic centimeter having a total surface area of ash of 45 cm 2 cm −3 . According to previous studies, the specific surface area of fine volcanic ash is in the range 0.2-2.1 m 2 g −1 (Delmelle et al, 2005;Mills and Rose, 2010). We find 0.9 m 2 g −1 as the specific surface area of the fine ash in this study, which is well within the range mentioned above.…”
Section: Size Distribution Of the Ashsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Fine ash is thought to represent a substantial contribution (50-97 wt %) to tephra deposits from plinian and subplinian volcanic eruptions (Rose and Durant, 2009). Particles in this size range not only have a higher surface to mass ratio (compared to the coarser particles) for interaction with the gases and aqueous phases (Delmelle et al, 2005) but can also be lifted to high altitudes and remain suspended in the atmosphere for several days before sedimentation (Sparks et al, 1997). Among others, Rose and Durant (2009) investigated the ash content of volcanic eruption plumes and suggested a typical polymodal size distribution for fine ash subdivided into 27 bins (Fig.…”
Section: Size Distribution Of the Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low real refractive index of 1.42 could be also a result of an average between the refractive indexes of various particles, e.g., pure volcanic and sulfate aerosols or their mixtures. This might be also due to presence of liquid water coating the dust particles as a result of water vapor condensation near the emission point (Delmelle et al, 2005;Lathem et al, 2011). This would be consistent with the presence of spherical particles near the emission point (FS ∼ 25 %), which would tend to disappear as the plume is transported and liquid water evaporates or turns into ice crystals.…”
Section: Volcanic Aerosol Properties Above Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Whilst the effect this may have on morphology is poorly constrained, the effects on binding mechanisms can be more readily investigated. Volcanic ash plumes contain abundant aerosol and gas phases which can be scavenged by silicate ash particles and can cause rapid surface acid dissolution (Rose, 1977;Varekamp et al, 1984;Oskarsson, 1980;Delmelle et al, 2005Delmelle et al, , 2007. This can alter the particle surface chemistry and result in the precipitation of sulphate and halide salts at the ash-liquid interface (Delmelle et al, 2007).…”
Section: Aggregation Within Ash Plumes: Conditions and Downwind Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%