1956
DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.1956.0050128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Areas of Clay Minerals as Derived from Measurements of Glycerol Retention

Abstract: The use of glycerol retention measurements to calculate surface areas of clay minerals is described. Assuming that the glycerol retained on external surfaces is monomolecular in thickness, and that both this layer and the monomolecular glycerol layers adsorbed on internal surfaces of montmorillonite, vermiculite, and halloysite are of the density of liquid glycerol, it is calculated that each percentage of glycerol retained corresponds to an area of 17.6 square meters per gram on external surfaces and 35.3 on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have been developed, including: the method of S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett, and E. Teller (1938), commonly called the B.E.T. method, which relies on the adsorption of a vapor; the methods of Dyal and Hendricks (1950), Diamond and Kinter (1958), and Carter et al (1965) which rely on the adsorption of an organic solvent, namely, ethylene glycol, glycerol, and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME), respectively; and the method of Schofield (1949) which relies on the negative adsorption of anions. In recent years, the EGME method has gained precedence because it is relatively quick and does not suffer from some of the disadvantages associated with the other methods (see, e.g., Mortland and Kemper, 1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed, including: the method of S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett, and E. Teller (1938), commonly called the B.E.T. method, which relies on the adsorption of a vapor; the methods of Dyal and Hendricks (1950), Diamond and Kinter (1958), and Carter et al (1965) which rely on the adsorption of an organic solvent, namely, ethylene glycol, glycerol, and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME), respectively; and the method of Schofield (1949) which relies on the negative adsorption of anions. In recent years, the EGME method has gained precedence because it is relatively quick and does not suffer from some of the disadvantages associated with the other methods (see, e.g., Mortland and Kemper, 1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, as claimed by Diamond and Kinter (1956), the ratio of external to total surface provides an indication of the thickness of the particles, we would be forced to conclude that the different clays had widely different particle thicknesses: The particles of the Cheto clay were thickest, that is, had the greatest stacking of layers, and the particles of the Belle Fourcke clay were thinnest. Figure 1 shows cumulative plots of the particle size distributions of the clays used in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal and external surface areas were determined by the method of Diamond and Kinter (1956) and Kinter and Diamond (1956). Particle size distributions were determined by a centrifugation technique using an International No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No specific surface determinations were performed. However, specific surface data on the < 2 # fraction of illite have been reported by Orchiston (1959), Diamond and Kinter (1958), and in the Cornell Reports (1949Reports ( -1951. The range was from 81 to 95 mZ/g.…”
Section: Experimental Void Ratio Vs Pressure Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 97%