2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface atoms core-level shifts in single crystal GaAs surfaces: Interactions with trimethylaluminum and water prepared by atomic layer deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the established reports, we have demonstrated that the As(1), As(2), and As(3) atoms are parts of the As 3d core level spectrum with the bulk component. 17,18 The detailed energy positions of the surface As atoms are shown in Figure 3b. The As(1) component predominates the emission on the high BE side and is shifted by 0.14 eV, whereas both As(2) and As(3) components are on the low BE side and are shifted by 0.19 and 0.59 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the established reports, we have demonstrated that the As(1), As(2), and As(3) atoms are parts of the As 3d core level spectrum with the bulk component. 17,18 The detailed energy positions of the surface As atoms are shown in Figure 3b. The As(1) component predominates the emission on the high BE side and is shifted by 0.14 eV, whereas both As(2) and As(3) components are on the low BE side and are shifted by 0.19 and 0.59 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tremendous progress has been achieved in the past few years in preparing and understanding dielectric/III-V interfaces electronically 33 and electrically. 34 , 35 Perfecting the high-κ dielectric/III-V interfaces to lower the D it and to improve the thermal stability at high temperatures has resulted in improved device performance.…”
Section: The Dielectric/iii-v Semiconductor Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the RHEED studies of ALD-Y 2 O 3 on GaAs(111)A, as discussed above, those of ALD-Al 2 O 3 on GaAs(111)A, from the initial ALD oxide growth to thicker films, are non-crystalline (not shown). Our earlier work indicated that 10 cycles of ALD-Al 2 O 3 were not able to passivate 100% of a GaAs(001)-4 × 6 surface [ 38 ]. Therefore, the initial three cycles of ALD-Al 2 O 3 on sample B would leave bare (not passivated) patches of GaAs(111)A for the subsequent three cycles of ALD-Y 2 O 3 to bond with, resulting in mixed coverages of Al 2 O 3 and Y 2 O 3 on top of GaAs(111)A on sample B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y–O–Ga prevented the interdiffusion between Y 2 O 3 and GaAs upon RTA to high temperatures, regardless of ALD- or MBE-Y 2 O 3 , as evidenced from the attainment of low D it and a low electrical leakage current in the Y 2 O 3 /GaAs(001)-4 × 6 [ 40 , 41 ]. Note that the top surface atoms of GaAs(111)A are Ga [ 36 , 42 ], while those of (001)-4 × 6 are As [ 38 , 43 ]. Therefore, forming Y–O–Ga bonding is easier for ALD-Y 2 O 3 on GaAs(111)A than that on GaAs(001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%