2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4870419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface band-bending and Fermi-level pinning in doped Si observed by Kelvin force microscopy

Abstract: The workfunction change in doped Si was examined using Kelvin force microscopy in a wide range of doping concentrations from p-type ∼1019 to n-type ∼1020 cm−3 corresponding to the bulk Fermi-level positions from near the valence-band top to conduction-band minimum. Experimental data can be reproduced by model calculations using an appropriate surface-state density composed of the donor- and acceptor-like gap states. These results indicate that no appreciable surface-band bending occurs for doping concentration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the yield of products integrated on the Si wafer, it is important and necessary to characterize the surface properties of the Si wafer rapidly, efficiently, and quantitatively before and after the chemical treatment during the fabrication process. Several useful but complicated tools have been proposed to estimate the surface potential; these include X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy 12 , surface photovoltage measurement 13 , 14 , and Kelvin force microscopy 15 , 16 . Methods for sensitive local surface evaluation and rapid surface property mapping are still lacking and urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the yield of products integrated on the Si wafer, it is important and necessary to characterize the surface properties of the Si wafer rapidly, efficiently, and quantitatively before and after the chemical treatment during the fabrication process. Several useful but complicated tools have been proposed to estimate the surface potential; these include X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy 12 , surface photovoltage measurement 13 , 14 , and Kelvin force microscopy 15 , 16 . Methods for sensitive local surface evaluation and rapid surface property mapping are still lacking and urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KPFM is based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) [ 11–13 ]. The underlying principle of KPFM is that the contact potential difference (CPD) between the tip and the sample surface is detected from the change in the resonance frequency or amplitude of the cantilever by applying an AC bias voltage [ 7 , 14 ]. The AC bias voltage modulates the electrostatic interaction force between the tip and the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ref. [ 14 ], increasing the concentration of impurities in a semiconductor causes band bending near the semiconductor surface; as a result, the CPD values deviates from those expected from the bulk states. Therefore, the CPD values measured by KPFM are affected by both the surface and bulk states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KPFM measures the contact potential difference, which corresponds to the work function difference, between the sample surface and the tip. So far, KPFM has been used in analyses such as of the work function of metallic samples and the surface potential of semiconductor samples [3][4][5][6]. KPFM is a member of the atomic force microscopy (AFM) family, and uses an oscillating cantilever.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%