2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2008.11.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface charging suppression using PEDOT/PSS in the fabrication of three dimensional structures on a quartz substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This chapter presents a number of approaches attempted for grounding the trapped charges for suppressing the surface charging effects during the pattern definition on quartz substrate. This also applies in fabricating three-dimensional nanostructures on insulating substrates [8]. The deposition of thin metallic layer on top of imaging resist layer is a common practise but requires wet etching process using acidic solution to remove the metallic layer in post e-beam exposure process.…”
Section: The Fabrication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This chapter presents a number of approaches attempted for grounding the trapped charges for suppressing the surface charging effects during the pattern definition on quartz substrate. This also applies in fabricating three-dimensional nanostructures on insulating substrates [8]. The deposition of thin metallic layer on top of imaging resist layer is a common practise but requires wet etching process using acidic solution to remove the metallic layer in post e-beam exposure process.…”
Section: The Fabrication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Metal coatings deposited on top of PMMA resist are usually used to overcome the charge accumulation problem. 7 The described approaches have demonstrated reasonable outcomes and are considered to be promising methodologies for fabrication of nanoscale UV masters. 3 However, scattering of electrons in the metal layer limits the applicability of this technique at the deep nanoscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast to conducting substrates, when exposing insulating substrates with an electron beam, the charge can become trapped near the surface, is unable to dissipate, resulting in charge build up and subsequently deflecting additional incoming electrons. This results in distorted patterns and loss in resolution [11,21,25]. A conductive layer, either above / below the resist, is commonly used in conjunction with patterning on insulating substrates -illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Considerations For Ebl On Insulating Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanofabrication on insulating substrates using high energy EBL can be challenging due to several key factors. These include increased electron back scattering; insufficient charge dissipation; large area dose required for exposing conventional high resolution e-beam resists (such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) / hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) / ZEP-series) at high EBL acceleration voltages; and inevitably a large beam current in order to pattern with acceptable throughput [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Workarounds include depositing an ultra-thin metallic layer either above or below the resist or using a conductive polymer; both methods are used to dissipate the built-up charge during exposure [10,[17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%