“…On the CuO x /Cu(111) region of the surface without zirconia (lower spectra, Figure ), the peaks associated with surface intermediates are substantially smaller and shifted in energy relative to the C(ad) peak in the corresponding spectra with zirconia on the surface. For example, the fitted data reveal a peak at ∼285.6 eV which falls between the H x CO* and CH 3 O* features in the spectra in the zirconia region; since this peak exhibits similar intensity trends as H x CO* and CH 3 O* in the zirconia region, we assign this peak at ∼285.6 eV to H x C–O* and H x CO species, consistent with other reported values for these species on bare Cu surfaces. , The peak at ∼287.7 eV is assigned to formate (HCOO*) based on previous studies of CO 2 exposure on Cu and CuO x /Cu(111) surfaces, although it may also overlap contributions from carboxylate (CO 2 δ− ). ,,,, Consequently, we label this peak as CO 2 δ− /HCOO*. At even higher binding energy (289.7–289.9 eV), a small peak appears between 400 and 500 K and is tentatively assigned to carbonate (*CO 3 ). ,,− Overall, the carbon-based species observed in the surface region without zirconia are consistent with CO 2 interactions on Cu and CuO x surfaces and are clearly distinguishable from those in the Zr/CuO 2 /Cu(111) surface region.…”