2017
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1314036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface chemistry of gold nanoparticles determines the biocorona composition impacting cellular uptake, toxicity and gene expression profiles in human endothelial cells

Abstract: This study investigated the role of nanoparticle size and surface chemistry on biocorona composition and its effect on uptake, toxicity and cellular responses in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), employing 40 and 80 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNP) with branched polyethyleneimine (BPEI), lipoic acid (LA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings. Proteomic analysis identified 59 hard corona proteins among the various AuNP, revealing largely surface chemistry-dependent signature adsorbomes exhibiting hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
78
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By proteomic analysis on the surface chemistry‐dependent signature adsorbates, researchers find that human serum albumin (HSA) can more easily form corona on NMs surface than human plasma protein (HP). Time‐dependent cellular uptake detection shows that HSA corona‐bound gold nanoparticles have significant reduction in cellular uptake compared with HP corona‐bound ones . Another interesting report shows that gold‐based NMs with the same chemical composition but different surface modification have totally different cell membrane response.…”
Section: Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By proteomic analysis on the surface chemistry‐dependent signature adsorbates, researchers find that human serum albumin (HSA) can more easily form corona on NMs surface than human plasma protein (HP). Time‐dependent cellular uptake detection shows that HSA corona‐bound gold nanoparticles have significant reduction in cellular uptake compared with HP corona‐bound ones . Another interesting report shows that gold‐based NMs with the same chemical composition but different surface modification have totally different cell membrane response.…”
Section: Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, the zeta potential of poly(diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDDAC), CTAB, and polystyrene sulfonate (PSS)decorated gold nanorods (GNRs) (33 × 30 and 55 × 14 nm) in aqueous solutions was found to decrease from ∼50 to −40 mV, and the cellular uptake level by these GNRs in MCF-7 cells decreased with the decrease in zeta potential (Qiu et al, 2010). Positively charged branched polyethyleneimine-decorated GNPs (40, 80 nm) were more likely than negatively charged lipoic acid-GNPs to be endocytosed by HUVECs (Chandran et al, 2017). In monocytes and macrophages, positively charged cysteamine-GNPs (10, 20, and 40 nm) were internalized at a higher level than were negatively charged or zwitterionic GNPs (Oh and Park, 2014).…”
Section: Surface Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanotubes, silica nanorods, gold nanoparticles, magnetism‐engineered iron oxide, and polymeric micelles have been recently used for drug encapsulation and delivery devices. However, such nanomaterials present long‐term instability; as well as being subjected to metal impurities, they suffer particle aggregation and decomposition inside the cell, inducing cell damage and cytotoxicity …”
Section: Cytotoxicity Of Cncs: a Critical Evaluation Of The Biocompatmentioning
confidence: 99%