1994
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface coil MR imaging: utility of image intensity correction filter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has been realized in commercial systems such as Phased array UnifoRmity Enhancement (PURE -General Electric (GE)), Prescan Normalize (Siemens), CLEAR (Philips) and NATURAL (Hitachi). One of the consequences of using such intensity correction approaches is it creates a spatial dependence on background noise (which is uniformly distributed [9,10] prior to correction). This results in increasing noise levels as we move away from the coil in the corrected images, which is particularly visible in regions distant from the coil [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach has been realized in commercial systems such as Phased array UnifoRmity Enhancement (PURE -General Electric (GE)), Prescan Normalize (Siemens), CLEAR (Philips) and NATURAL (Hitachi). One of the consequences of using such intensity correction approaches is it creates a spatial dependence on background noise (which is uniformly distributed [9,10] prior to correction). This results in increasing noise levels as we move away from the coil in the corrected images, which is particularly visible in regions distant from the coil [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the consequences of using such intensity correction approaches is it creates a spatial dependence on background noise (which is uniformly distributed [9,10] prior to correction). This results in increasing noise levels as we move away from the coil in the corrected images, which is particularly visible in regions distant from the coil [10]. An example is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common challenge faced in bias correction, particularly when dealing with the significant intensity inhomogeneities exhibited in DW-MR acquisitions using endorectal coil, is the undesired noise amplification which can have significant negative effects on not only interpretation but also tasks such as segmentation and registration [46], [20]. Most existing bias correction methods either do not take into account the issue of noise amplification [38], [40], [47], [48] or add a simple spatial filter to the designed method to control the effect of data noise as an independent pre-or post-processing step [49], [50].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many MRI scanners, a common feature is a built-in surface coil intensity correction (SCIC) algorithm that postprocesses the images [33]- [35] or calibrates the acquisition to correct for the intensity variations [19]. A precalibration correction approach such as the one proposed by Liney et al, uses a series of proton density (PD) weighted images to determine the bias profile so that a correction matrix can be generated and applied to correct upon acquisition [19].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Bias Field Correction In Endorectalmentioning
confidence: 99%