2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface complexation modeling of arsenic mobilization from goethite: Interpretation of an in-situ experiment

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual SCMs were developed to model As (III) and As(V) adsorption, separately, with adsorption sites of Surf_a for As (III) adsorption onto gray sediments and Surf_b for As(V) adsorption onto brown sediments. The models were developed using the geochemical codes of PHREEQC-3 (Parkhurst & Appelo, 2013), coupled with MATLAB software using the Iphreeqc module (Charlton & Parkhurst, 2011;Muniruzzaman & Rolle, 2016;Stolze et al, 2019) and the wateq4f.dat database (Ball & Nordstrom, 1991). A genetic algorithm calibration code was linked with Iphreeqc by MATLAB to estimate the parameters of the SCMs, including the equilibrium constants of each surface complexation reaction (log K) and the number of surface sites (m).…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025492mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual SCMs were developed to model As (III) and As(V) adsorption, separately, with adsorption sites of Surf_a for As (III) adsorption onto gray sediments and Surf_b for As(V) adsorption onto brown sediments. The models were developed using the geochemical codes of PHREEQC-3 (Parkhurst & Appelo, 2013), coupled with MATLAB software using the Iphreeqc module (Charlton & Parkhurst, 2011;Muniruzzaman & Rolle, 2016;Stolze et al, 2019) and the wateq4f.dat database (Ball & Nordstrom, 1991). A genetic algorithm calibration code was linked with Iphreeqc by MATLAB to estimate the parameters of the SCMs, including the equilibrium constants of each surface complexation reaction (log K) and the number of surface sites (m).…”
Section: 1029/2019wr025492mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in the study of Datta et al (2009), when anoxic groundwater discharges in rivers, mixing with oxic water leads to oxidation of dissolved iron and precipitation of iron oxides. This precipitation process also traps other dissolved elements, such as arsenic, that can be immobilized through sorption and incorporation in iron mineral phases (Kocar et al 2006;Jessen et al 2012;Stolze et al 2019). Datta et al (2009) measured large arsenic concentrations in shallow sediments along the Meghna river in Bangladesh.…”
Section: Mixing Fronts and Arsenic Attenuation In The Hyporheic Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the investigation of charge‐induced processes that was the main focus of this study, the model offers extended capability to capture a series of chemical reactions, including aqueous speciation, mineral precipitation‐dissolution, degradation and kinetic reactions, mobilization of heavy metals and metalloids, acidic front propagation, and radionuclides displacement and isotope fractionation, utilizing PHREEQC as a reaction engine. Therefore, the developed MMIT‐Clay framework can also be applied to subsurface systems where, besides charge interactions, other physical, chemical, and biological processes are of interest (e.g., Druhan et al, ; Fakhreddine et al, ; McNeece & Hesse, ; Molins et al, ; Poonoosamy et al, ; Prigiobbe & Bryant, ; Stolze et al, , ). The multidimensional and flow‐through perspective on multicomponent ionic transport in heterogeneous clayey formations introduced in this study could also be extended to fully 3‐D setups where complex anisotropy and flow topology may play a major role (e.g., Chiogna et al, ; Cirpka et al, ; Ye et al, , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%