2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2011.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface deformation along the Carmel Fault System, Israel

Abstract: International audienceThe existing knowledge about the recent crustal deformations along the Carmel Fault in Northern Israel which passes the city of Haifa is to a certain degree ambiguous. Depending on geological, geophysical or geodetic sources the movement rates and senses range from 1mm/yr sinistral up to 4mm/yr dextral. In this paper we analyze GPS data from a regional network observed between 1999 and 2009 and derive global and regional velocities for 23 sites along the fault. The regional site velocitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results reaffirm and refine earlier interpretations of the Carmel Fault from GPS [ Wdowinski et al , 2004; Le Beon et al , 2008] and InSAR analyses [ Nof et al , 2007] and further reduce the uncertainty and maximum slip rate constraint. Our results disagree with recent interpretations of 4.5 mm/yr of right‐lateral displacement by Reinking et al [2011] based on short occupation (typically less than 6 h), survey‐mode GPS data. However, we believe the CGPS results are more reliable than the survey‐mode results of Reinking et al [2011], owing to survey epochs of longer duration (typically 24‐h) and greater number (in this study, weekly observations spanning 6+ years).…”
Section: Modeling Of Gps Velocitiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results reaffirm and refine earlier interpretations of the Carmel Fault from GPS [ Wdowinski et al , 2004; Le Beon et al , 2008] and InSAR analyses [ Nof et al , 2007] and further reduce the uncertainty and maximum slip rate constraint. Our results disagree with recent interpretations of 4.5 mm/yr of right‐lateral displacement by Reinking et al [2011] based on short occupation (typically less than 6 h), survey‐mode GPS data. However, we believe the CGPS results are more reliable than the survey‐mode results of Reinking et al [2011], owing to survey epochs of longer duration (typically 24‐h) and greater number (in this study, weekly observations spanning 6+ years).…”
Section: Modeling Of Gps Velocitiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results disagree with recent interpretations of 4.5 mm/yr of right‐lateral displacement by Reinking et al [2011] based on short occupation (typically less than 6 h), survey‐mode GPS data. However, we believe the CGPS results are more reliable than the survey‐mode results of Reinking et al [2011], owing to survey epochs of longer duration (typically 24‐h) and greater number (in this study, weekly observations spanning 6+ years). Hence, we interpret that the Carmel Fault slips at a rate less than 0.5 mm/yr, at most.…”
Section: Modeling Of Gps Velocitiescontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the M 5.3 earthquake that occurred in 1984 between the Carmel Fault and the Izra'el Valley [Hofstetter et al, 1996] (Figure 5) suggests that this region is currently active and may produce moderate earthquakes. While the results of previous geodetic studies were ambiguous [Agmon, 2001;Ostrovsky, 2005;Reinking et al, 2011] the results obtained in this study clearly indicate a left-lateral sense of slip accompanied by fault-normal extension. Thus, elastic strain is currently being accumulated, and the possibility of moderate-to-large earthquakes along the Carmel Fault cannot be ruled out.…”
Section: The Carmel Faultcontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Because w < F , the null hypothesis was accepted, verifying that the five datum points were stable. The same points were used also by Reinking et al [14] to define a stable coordinate system for the network, but unlike here a constraint for equal velocities of adjacent sites (CR12-KRML and CR13-MRKA) was used. Therefore, the constraint for equal velocities is not a condition to establish datum based on these points.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the solution of the height component is not quality enough qualitative [14] the deformation analysis was done on the horizontal plane. A transformation to a local horizon system (north, east and up) was done relative to KRTV, which is located in the center of the network (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Velocity Field Estimation 41 Strip the Datum Content From Tmentioning
confidence: 99%