2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface EMG models: properties and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
218
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
218
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t -6 -However, under realistic conditions many motor units are simultaneously active, and the contributions of the individual motor units can barely be recognized in the recorded signal, but are intermingled in an interference pattern (Stegeman et al, 2000). This signal represents the surface electromyogram (sEMG).…”
Section: Motor Unit Action Potential and Electromyogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A c c e p t e d m a n u s c r i p t -6 -However, under realistic conditions many motor units are simultaneously active, and the contributions of the individual motor units can barely be recognized in the recorded signal, but are intermingled in an interference pattern (Stegeman et al, 2000). This signal represents the surface electromyogram (sEMG).…”
Section: Motor Unit Action Potential and Electromyogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMG, after the processing used herein, is rather analogous to the average rectified values of surface EMG and the RMS-based EMG processing described by Basmajian and De Luca [32]. Surface EMG may be considered a structure-based model, reductionally representing the system's important elements [33], whereas FMG is a more phenomenological model, based on its direct correlations and resemblance to grip force.…”
Section: Force Myography As Control Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the physical model used for the generation of the surface MUAPs is the description of the subcutaneous layers and of the muscle as infinite parallel layers (13,15). Other models may be better in this respect, as, for example, the approach followed by Kleine et al (25), who assumed a cylindrical volume conductor, which probably simulates the arm better (40). Again, we do not think our main conclusions would be different by assuming a different volume conductor shape.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Muapsmentioning
confidence: 99%