2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06426-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Energy Driven Cubic-to-Hexagonal Grain Growth of Ge2Sb2Te5 Thin Film

Abstract: Phase change memory (PCM) is a promising nonvolatile memory to reform current commercial computing system. Inhibiting face-centered cubic (f-) to hexagonal (h-) phase transition of Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST) thin film is essential for realizing high-density, high-speed, and low-power PCM. Although the atomic configurations of f- and h-lattices of GST alloy and the transition mechanisms have been extensively studied, the real transition process should be more complex than previous explanations, e.g. vacancy-ordering model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Ge/Te and Sb/Te ratios we have measured, slightly larger than expected for a regular Ge2Sb2Te5, might indicate that this material is doped, with Ge and Sb atoms at sites normally vacant on the cationic lattice (20%). It is important to note that, despite the high temperature involved, the GST phase we evidence is still cubic, as demonstrated by the HRTEM images, and not hexagonal as expected after annealing above the cubic-to-hexagonal transition temperature of the Ge2Sb2Te5 i.e., 300-350°C [18]. It is thus suspected that this transition is hampered by the environment, the Ge phase and probable stress at the interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the Ge/Te and Sb/Te ratios we have measured, slightly larger than expected for a regular Ge2Sb2Te5, might indicate that this material is doped, with Ge and Sb atoms at sites normally vacant on the cationic lattice (20%). It is important to note that, despite the high temperature involved, the GST phase we evidence is still cubic, as demonstrated by the HRTEM images, and not hexagonal as expected after annealing above the cubic-to-hexagonal transition temperature of the Ge2Sb2Te5 i.e., 300-350°C [18]. It is thus suspected that this transition is hampered by the environment, the Ge phase and probable stress at the interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…For this reason, countless studies have focused on the investigation of Ge2Sb2Te5 properties [9]. Ge2Sb2Te5 exists in two phases: a metastable face-centered-cubic (FCC) structure, which forms at a temperature T~150°C [16], and a stable hexagonal structure, which forms above T~300°C [18]. In the FCC phase, a FCC sub-lattice containing only Te atoms (anion sites) is intercalated with another FCC sub-lattice containing a solid solution of Ge and Sb atoms as well as vacancies (cation sites).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the cubic to hexagonal phase transition of GST‐225 is observed to progressively occur at the “classical” temperature of 380–400 °C. [ 33,34 ]…”
Section: Thermal Crystalization Of Ge‐rich Alloys: Ge Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their sizes may exceed that of the initial thickness of the deposited film and this evolution gives rise to the spatial structuring of the surface. It is interesting to note that the cubic to hexagonal phase transition of GST-225 is observed to progressively occur at the "classical" temperature of 380-400 C. [33,34] 3. Effect of N Doping: Slow Down N doping is known to significantly enhance the thermal stability of GGST alloys.…”
Section: Thermal Crystalization Of Ge-rich Alloys: Ge Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 These concentration-sensitive doping effects so far lack the corresponding microscopic explanations. On the other hand, the grain boundary plays a vital role in the behavior of GST alloys, 25,26 for instance, the grain boundary provides favorable doping sites for small dopants as observed in the experiments. 27,28 In addition, the structural distortions brought in by the boundary have an influence on the electronic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%