1996
DOI: 10.4294/zisin1948.49.1_113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Fault Ruptures on the Northwest Coast of Awaji Island Associated with the Hyogo-ken Nanbu Earthquake of 1995, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the earthquake, field surveys found that the known Nojima fault on Awaji island had moved right laterally [Awata et al, 1995]. On the contrary, seismic fatfits did not appear on the surface in the Kobe area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the earthquake, field surveys found that the known Nojima fault on Awaji island had moved right laterally [Awata et al, 1995]. On the contrary, seismic fatfits did not appear on the surface in the Kobe area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Nojima fault sample was obtained at the site where surface rupture occurred during the 1995 Kobe earthquake [Awata et al, 1996]. No surface rupture occurred along the Kusumoto fault [Awata et al, 1996].…”
Section: Samples and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Although surface rupture was observed on the Nojima Fault in the northwestern part of Awaji Island (Nakata et al, 1995;Awata et al, 1996), most of the aftershocks did not occur directly beneath the Nojima Fault, but along the Higashiura Fault and the Kariya Fault, and around the southern end of the Nojima Fault.…”
Section: Awaji Regionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The aftershock region extends about 70 km from northeast to southwest (Hirata et al, 1996;Katao et al, 1997). The surface rupture caused by the mainshock was observed along the Nojima Fault which is located on the northwestern coast of Awaji Island (Nakata et al, 1995;Awata et al, 1996). The observation of microearthquake activity for the past 30 years clearly shows that the seismicity along the mainshock rupture zone was low on the southern side of the Arima-Takatsuki Tectonic Line (ATTL) before the mainshock, while the seismicity has been high in the Tamba Plateau on the northern side of ATTL (Katao et al, 1997;Hiramatsu et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%