2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002jc001359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface forcing on the southern flank of Georges Bank, February–August 1995

Abstract: [1] Surface wind stress, heat, and freshwater fluxes were estimated over the southern flank of Georges Bank during February-August 1995 using moored measurements made at ST1 located on the 76-m isobath, roughly halfway between the tidal mixing and shelf/ slope fronts. Wind stress variability was dominated by a succession of atmospheric lows that passed Georges Bank during the deployment. A transition between frequent lows and strong wind stress events (''winter'') to less frequent lows and weaker wind stresses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with previous studies of surface heat flux in the Middle Atlantic Bight (Bunker, 1976;Joyce, 1987;Austin and Lentz, 1999), over nearby Georges Bank (Beardsley et al, 2003), and in the Gulf of Maine (Mountain et al, 1996).…”
Section: Surface Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results are consistent with previous studies of surface heat flux in the Middle Atlantic Bight (Bunker, 1976;Joyce, 1987;Austin and Lentz, 1999), over nearby Georges Bank (Beardsley et al, 2003), and in the Gulf of Maine (Mountain et al, 1996).…”
Section: Surface Heat Fluxsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This seasonal variation is qualitatively consistent with the seasonal variation in surface heat flux, i.e., surface warming in spring and summer and surface cooling in fall and winter [Beardsley and Boicourt, 1981;Joyce, 1987;Mountain et al, 1996;Beardsley et al, 2003]. However, the relative importance of advection to the seasonal variation in temperature, and to temperature variability in general, remains unclear because few observational studies have provided accurate estimates of the horizontal temperature gradients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…No measurements were obtained between 47 and 61 m because of instrument failures. Meteorological measurements obtained at ST1 included wind speed and direction, air temperature, relative humidity, incoming short and longwave radiation, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation [ Beardsley et al , 2003].…”
Section: Field Program and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%