1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03206710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface perception in pictures

Abstract: Subjects adjusted a local gauge figure such as to perceptually "fit" the apparent surfaces of objects depicted in photographs. We obtained a few hundred data points per session, covering the picture according to a uniform lattice. Settings were repeated 3 times for each of 3 subjects. Almost all of the variability resided in the slant; the relative spread in the slant was about 25% (Weber fraction). The tilt was reproduced with a typical spread of about 10°. The rank correlation of the slant settings of differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
203
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
16
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test this theory, we made stimuli in which we parametrically varied the amount of smear applied to the noise (more smear produces stronger orientation signals). We then asked subjects to adjust the 3D orientation of "gauge figure" probes distributed across the surface, to indicate the perceived local surface orientation (34). Subjects could click a button during the experiment to view a reconstruction of the reported 3D shape to compare with their percept of the shape-from-smear stimuli.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this theory, we made stimuli in which we parametrically varied the amount of smear applied to the noise (more smear produces stronger orientation signals). We then asked subjects to adjust the 3D orientation of "gauge figure" probes distributed across the surface, to indicate the perceived local surface orientation (34). Subjects could click a button during the experiment to view a reconstruction of the reported 3D shape to compare with their percept of the shape-from-smear stimuli.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we employed gauge figures such as shown in figure 2. The gauge figure was superimposed over the picture at some fiducial location and then was manually controlled via a computer mouse and adjusted by the subject so as to fit the local surface attitude visually-or rather 'pictoriaHy' (Koenderink et al 1992). The nature of the fit is defined via the instruction that the elliptical circumference of the gauge figure should appear as the outline of a circular disc painted on the surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This protocol was described in previous experiments such as [32] and [23]. Participants were shown a series of images from the system and asked to rotate gauges which overlaid the images to match the surface normal of the isosurface at that point.…”
Section: User Studymentioning
confidence: 99%