2014
DOI: 10.1145/2537130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-Reflection-Based Communication and Localization in Underwater Sensor Networks

Abstract: Most communication and localization algorithms in underwater environments have been constrained by dependencies on the Line Of Sight (LOS), which is hard to guarantee due to the inherent node mobility. This constraint hinders node discovery and ad hoc formation in underwater networks and limits the performance of routing protocols. This article introduces a novel Surface-Based Reflection (SBR) model that uses a homomorphic deconvolution technique to establish water-surface-reflected communication links. We the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, L}, where κ b is the bottom reflection coefficient, which (presumably) can be determined based on prior physical knowledge (e.g., assuming the bottom is sand, silt, clay, rock, etc.) and the angle of incidence, and is assumed to be known within the MFP framework for a given hypothesized emitter location p. For (10), we assumed a perfectly reflecting ocean surface [8], [31], which approximately holds for calm shallow waters. Based on this knowledge, the channel responses {H } can be readily computed.…”
Section: The Matched Field Processing Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, L}, where κ b is the bottom reflection coefficient, which (presumably) can be determined based on prior physical knowledge (e.g., assuming the bottom is sand, silt, clay, rock, etc.) and the angle of incidence, and is assumed to be known within the MFP framework for a given hypothesized emitter location p. For (10), we assumed a perfectly reflecting ocean surface [8], [31], which approximately holds for calm shallow waters. Based on this knowledge, the channel responses {H } can be readily computed.…”
Section: The Matched Field Processing Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete survey for underwater localization schemes is provided in [16], where the tradeoff between various localization methods is highlighted. Emokpae and Younis have proposed a surface-based reflection scheme to perform localization using both line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight links [17]. The authors use an average SS, i.e., a static medium model, to distinguish the different received signals, namely reflected and direct paths.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, is smaller than the communication radius r of sensor nodes, which is assumed to be the same for all sensor nodes in this article. Note that when is almost the same in value as r , the acoustic transmission loss should be high, the packet delivery ratio should be low and the bit error rate should be large [ 31 , 32 ]. This means that may not be appropriate to serve as the parent of , although is still within the communication radius of .…”
Section: Preliminaries: Routing Tree Construction and Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%