2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.79.115448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface relaxation phenomena at electrified interfaces: Revealing adsorbate, potential, and solvent effects by combined x-ray diffraction, STM and DFT studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
10
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported for chlorine adlayers under UHV conditions [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as in chloride-containing electrolytes. 6,7,[26][27][28][29][30][31] However, at the electrochemical interface the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ structure was observed only positive of a critical potential ͑−0.4 V Ag/AgCl at a Cl concentration of 10 −3 M͒ by in situ STM, whereas at more negative potentials the ͑1 ϫ 1͒ substrate lattice was visible, suggesting a potential-induced order-disorder phase transition into a dilute adlayer of highly mobile chloride. 28,30 More recently, the surface-normal interface structure of the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ adlayers of Cl and Br on Cu͑001͒ was studied by in situ SXRD, focusing on the halide-copper interlayer spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported for chlorine adlayers under UHV conditions [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] as well as in chloride-containing electrolytes. 6,7,[26][27][28][29][30][31] However, at the electrochemical interface the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ structure was observed only positive of a critical potential ͑−0.4 V Ag/AgCl at a Cl concentration of 10 −3 M͒ by in situ STM, whereas at more negative potentials the ͑1 ϫ 1͒ substrate lattice was visible, suggesting a potential-induced order-disorder phase transition into a dilute adlayer of highly mobile chloride. 28,30 More recently, the surface-normal interface structure of the c͑2 ϫ 2͒ adlayers of Cl and Br on Cu͑001͒ was studied by in situ SXRD, focusing on the halide-copper interlayer spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Specifically, up to now only a few studies have presented detailed measurements of the bond lengths at electrochemical interfaces that could be directly compared to structural data on corresponding anionic adlayer structures under UHV conditions. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Such comparative studies allow to clarify how the presence of the outer part of the double layer alters the chemical bonding of the chemisorbed inner adsorbate layer to the surface and the near surface structure of the metal electrode, which in turn may throw light on the interplay among the interactions of the various species at the interface, the charge distribution, and the interface structure. Here we present a combined surface x-ray diffraction ͑SXRD͒ and density-functional theory ͑DFT͒ study of Cu͑001͒ in hydrochloric acid which reveals that the presence of water and cations in the outer double layer not only introduces relaxations in the spacing of the chemisorbed chloride and the first metal layers but also a reversal of a subsurface lattice modulation as compared to that observed in UHV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chloride and bromide form the same lateral structure on Cu(100) their charge state on Cu(100) is different. Recent in-situ x-ray scattering experiments point to a bromide species which is more discharged in the adsorbed state [31]. The nature of the specifically adsorbed anion has apparently no significant impact on the instantaneous reduction of adsorbed DPV on the halide-modified copper surface, at least for chloride and bromide.…”
Section: Ex-situ Xps Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a p(11)-Br model assumed p4 mm space group (a 1 = b 1 = c 1 = 408.6 pm, a = b = g = 908) for the structural analysis as reported previously. [15][16][17] We first optimized the structures along the direction normal to the electrode surface using the specular CTR with 39 reflections. Then we optimized the in-plane structure of Cs and the buckling structure of internal Ag layer using the non-specular CTR and FOR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar fluctuations of FOR was reported for the Cl on Cu(100) and the Br on Cu(100). [16][17][18] We analyzed the CTR and the FOR in CsBr at À0.4 V vs Ag/ AgCl on the basis of the results in LiBr. The fractional order (1/2 1/2) rod in CsBr differs from that in LiBr, as shown in Figures 4 a,b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%