1999
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.39.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness of Solidified Mold Flux in Continuous Casting Process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A crystalline layer in slag film yields larger thermal resistance by producing air gap at the flux/mold interface and scattering infrared radiation from steel. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The authors have focused on the compound, cuspidine (3CaO · 2SiO 2 · CaF 2 ), which crystallizes in the crystalline layer in flux films. [9][10][11] Since cuspidine primarily crystallizes in almost all of commercial mold fluxes, controlling the crystallinity is a key factor to control the horizontal heat flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A crystalline layer in slag film yields larger thermal resistance by producing air gap at the flux/mold interface and scattering infrared radiation from steel. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The authors have focused on the compound, cuspidine (3CaO · 2SiO 2 · CaF 2 ), which crystallizes in the crystalline layer in flux films. [9][10][11] Since cuspidine primarily crystallizes in almost all of commercial mold fluxes, controlling the crystallinity is a key factor to control the horizontal heat flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Normally, it is stated that the gap arises because the crystalline phase has a higher density than the glass, and therefore crystallization results in shrinkage of the solid flux layer. [10,11] In an investigation carried out to determine the surface roughness of solidified mold fluxes, it was found that this was in the range of 10 to 30 lm, when the crystalline phase precipitated; [12] this surface roughness was claimed to agree with the calculated thickness of the air gap assumed to form between the mold and the solidified slag layer. Furthermore, it was disclosed that the surface roughness of mold powder slags for casting medium-carbon steels is larger than that of mold slags used for low-carbon steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, it was disclosed that the surface roughness of mold powder slags for casting medium-carbon steels is larger than that of mold slags used for low-carbon steels. [12] Other authors indicated that substantial shrinkage occurs in mold fluxes for medium-carbon steels due to larger volumetric ratio and faster growth rate of cuspidine, as compared to what occurs in mold fluxes for low-carbon steels; [13] however, no clear evidence of the shrinkage was provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the present work, reproduction of the reactions between carbon, slag and iron was made at the ironmaking temperature. A confocal laser-scanning microscope combined with an infrared image-heating furnace, 9) which enabled us to make microscopic "in-situ" observation at high temperature, was used in the present work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%