2020
DOI: 10.24874/ti.940.08.20.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Roughness Prediction in CNC Hole Turning of 3X13 Steel using Support Vector Machine Algorithm

Abstract: This paper presents research on a prediction method of surface roughness in the hole turning process of 3X13 steel. The experimental matrix was designed by using the Central Composite Design (CCD) with four input parameters including cutting speed, feed rate, cutting depth, and tool nose radius. Using the response surface method (RSM), a quadratic polynomial model was proposed to predict the surface roughness. Besides, another method that was used to predict surface roughness was the Support Vector Machine (SV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction results show the minimum Ra value can be achieved using SVM approach. Do Duc et al [22] predicted the Ra value of 3X13 steel material in CNC hole turning process. The machining experimental was conducted based on DOE with feed rate, cutting speed, tool nose radius and cutting depth as the input parameters.…”
Section: B Proposed Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction results show the minimum Ra value can be achieved using SVM approach. Do Duc et al [22] predicted the Ra value of 3X13 steel material in CNC hole turning process. The machining experimental was conducted based on DOE with feed rate, cutting speed, tool nose radius and cutting depth as the input parameters.…”
Section: B Proposed Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods have a common disadvantage, which is the optimal value set is one of the experimental values. This means that these techniques select one of the data sets that have been used, and in many cases, they are not the best [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%