1961
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(61)90034-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface self diffusion measurements on nickel by the mass transfer method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This disagreement may be associated with the nonequilibrium grain boundary structure; there are reports of "anomalous" diffusion in nanocrystalline materials due to presumed nonequilibrated grain boundaries exhibiting diffusion properties more like a free surface. [43][44][45] The activation energy for surface selfdiffusion on a (111) plane in Ni is 60 kJ/mol, 46 which is reasonably close to what we measure in Fig. 3.…”
Section: A Linear Hardening Regimesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This disagreement may be associated with the nonequilibrium grain boundary structure; there are reports of "anomalous" diffusion in nanocrystalline materials due to presumed nonequilibrated grain boundaries exhibiting diffusion properties more like a free surface. [43][44][45] The activation energy for surface selfdiffusion on a (111) plane in Ni is 60 kJ/mol, 46 which is reasonably close to what we measure in Fig. 3.…”
Section: A Linear Hardening Regimesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…7,18 For Ni at 473 K, the diffusivity of surface self-diffusion is estimated to be D s $ 10 À17 À 10 À14 m 2 /s. [26][27][28] At a timescale s $ 4 Â 10 2 s, the diffusion distance L ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi D s s p $ 63 nm to 2 lm, larger than the grain size in the as-deposited nickel films ($20-40 nm, determined using TEM). Therefore, surface diffusion is fast enough to lead to changes in the structure associated with each grain surface as proposed in the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Quantitative data were also obtained using the model and will be presented in the next chapter along with the experimental data. As shown in Table 5-1 and Table 5-2, the surface self-diffusivity data obtained from literature 36,37 contains significant ranges of error, while the ranges of error in energy are comparatively small 38, 39. Changing the energy within the given ranges of error generally did not change the retraction rate significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%