1975
DOI: 10.1086/628097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Stone Movement and Scree Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
195
2
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
9
195
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter was done to investigate if there is a relationship between the size of the material on the slope surface, the radius of the falling rock and the energy loss during a rebound on the slope surface as described by Kirkby and Statham (1975).…”
Section: Real-size Rockfall Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter was done to investigate if there is a relationship between the size of the material on the slope surface, the radius of the falling rock and the energy loss during a rebound on the slope surface as described by Kirkby and Statham (1975).…”
Section: Real-size Rockfall Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorren et al (2004) showed that the change of velocity after a rebound is mainly determined by the tangential coefficient of restitution and the slope angle at the rebound position. Both parameters are determined by the composition and size of the material covering the surface and the radius of the falling rock itself, since for larger rocks the effective surface roughness is lower than for smaller rocks, as shown by Kirkby and Statham (1975), and analogue to the principle of the slope variation coefficient used by, e.g. Pfeiffer and Bowen (1989), Spang and Krauter (2001) and Dorren et al (2004).…”
Section: Velocity Of the Falling Rockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondence to: D. Schneuwly (dominique.schneuwly@unifr.ch) runout distances (Kirkby and Statham, 1975;Statham and Francis, 1986;Okura et al, 2000). Furthermore, there are a large number of studies on rockfall modeling (Guzzetti et al, 2002;Dorren et al, 2006;Stoffel et al, 2006b) or on long-term accretion rates of rockfall (Luckman and Fiske, 1995;McCarroll et al, 1998).…”
Section: Ormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different models for study on rock-fall events in three main categories: (1) empirical models based on relationships between topographical factors and the length of the run out of rock-falls (e.g., Keylock and Domaas 1999), (2) process-based models that describe or simulate the modes of motion of falling rocks over slope surfaces (e.g., Kirkby and Statham 1975;Statham 1976;Hungr and Evans 1988;Pfeiffer and Bowen 1989;Kobayashi et al 1990), and (3) GIS-based models that are running within a GIS environment or they are raster-based models for which input data are provided by GIS analysis (e.g., Evans and Hungr 1993;Hegg and Kienholz 1995;Chau et al 2004). Little work was done on rock-fall susceptibility mapping based on GIS (e.g., Carrara et al 1995;Chung et al 1995;Guzzetti et al 1999;Suzen and Doyuran 2004a, b;Chau et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%