1972
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(72)90246-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface tensions of binary liquid systems. II. Mixtures of alcohols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure , plotted were three different types of liquid mixtures, nitrogen + methane (non‐associating), toluene + ethanol (self‐associating), and 1‐propanol +1‐decanol (cross‐associating); and in Figure , shown the calculated results for formic acid + water at 293.15, 308.15, and 323.15 K with a temperature‐independent binary interaction parameter. One can see that a good agreement between experimental and theoretical results was observed in Figure . However, for the aqueous formic acid solution, the small deviations between experimental and theoretical results, especially within the concentration range of formic acid from 0.05 to 0.20 in mole fraction where the surface tension rapidly change with formic acid composition, were observed although the proposed method can generally capture the experimental results.…”
Section: Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure , plotted were three different types of liquid mixtures, nitrogen + methane (non‐associating), toluene + ethanol (self‐associating), and 1‐propanol +1‐decanol (cross‐associating); and in Figure , shown the calculated results for formic acid + water at 293.15, 308.15, and 323.15 K with a temperature‐independent binary interaction parameter. One can see that a good agreement between experimental and theoretical results was observed in Figure . However, for the aqueous formic acid solution, the small deviations between experimental and theoretical results, especially within the concentration range of formic acid from 0.05 to 0.20 in mole fraction where the surface tension rapidly change with formic acid composition, were observed although the proposed method can generally capture the experimental results.…”
Section: Case Studiessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Experimental (symbols) and theoretical (lines) surface tensions of nitrogen (1) + methane (2) at 90.67 K ( k 12 = k 21 = 0.03712), toluene (1) + ethanol (2) at 303.15 K ( k 12 = k 21 = −0.01620), and 1‐propanol (1) + 1‐decanol (2) at 298.15 K ( k 12 = k 21 = −0.33658) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the surface area is lower in powders dehydrated by EW than by AD, the mechanism responsible for reducing the agglomeration degree is reportedly similar in EW and in distillation with iso-butanol [17,26,41]. The surface tensions of ethanol (21.82 mN m À 1 at 25 1C [47]) and iso-butanol (24.18 mN m À 1 at 25 1C [48]) are very close, suggesting that surface tension is not the main influencer of the degree of agglomeration. The surface areas in the EW and AD techniques likely differ because butoxy groups more effectively prevent the formation of surface Zr−O−Zr bonds than ethoxy groups.…”
Section: Powder Characteristics and Their Relations To The Dehydratiomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The source and purity of the chemical compounds are shown in Table 1, together with the experimental densities, surface tensions, and values reported by other authors [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The liquids were used without further purification other than being kept over molecular sieves to remove water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%