1978
DOI: 10.1038/271431a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface topography as a nonstationary random process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
347
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 639 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
11
347
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A great deal of experimental data [19,20,21,22] corroborate a robust scaling relation for w(L) along an impressive interval of variability of eight decades in L, from typically 10 −6 m to 10 2 m:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A great deal of experimental data [19,20,21,22] corroborate a robust scaling relation for w(L) along an impressive interval of variability of eight decades in L, from typically 10 −6 m to 10 2 m:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We conjecture that the origin of the tendency of χ(L) for interacting rough surfaces to display power laws in L in several physical situations as exemplified in Figs. 2 to 5 is connected with the frequently observed fractal nonstationary behavior of the roughness of surfaces [1,15,19]; by this we understand that a sample of finite length L taken from a real surface will never, however long, completely represents its properties. If the height h(x) of a surface as a function of the position along a particular cut, x, is measured, the associated roughness can be defined by the width w = h(x) 2 − h(x) 2 1/2 , where h(…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early in 1978, Sayles [7] believed that the surface morphology was unstable stochastic processes, the traditional some statistical parameters could not characterize the random behavior and detailed features of the fracture morphology comprehensively. As the fractal geometry came into being, in 1984, Mandelbrot [8] first proposed to characterizing the morphology characteristic of fracture surface of metal quantitatively by the fractal dimension; from then on, the fractal geometry was used to characterize the characterize the morphology characteristic of fracture surface of materials widely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of quantitative information of this kind will subsequently make it possible to optimize conditions for the machining of parts and to provide for the required level of parameters of surface microrelief. That is why present work should be considered as further development and practical application of approaches and results [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, it becomes clear why significant attention is paid to studying the microrelief of the surface of samples both theoretically and practically. Among the theoretical directions in the studies of the surface microrelief state, of special interest are the series of articles that deal with the application of sufficiently new, nontrivial mathematical methods for analysis of the surface relief state [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. They include papers on the application of fractal representations to the description of the self-similar states, which are formed either naturally, for example, due to the reflection by the surface of crystallographic properties of the volume of material of the base layer [8,9], or due to the periodic action on the surface of machnining tool [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%