2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2004.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface-treatment effects on organic thin-film transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, in polymer systems, the component with the lower surface free energy segregates to the surface [27]. Since PETA is more hydrophobic than PEO [26], PETA should have lower surface free energy and would be expected to segregate to the surface [28,29]. Furthermore, the molecular weight difference between PETA and PEO should also affect the surface composition with the lower molecular weight PETA segregating to the surface [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, in polymer systems, the component with the lower surface free energy segregates to the surface [27]. Since PETA is more hydrophobic than PEO [26], PETA should have lower surface free energy and would be expected to segregate to the surface [28,29]. Furthermore, the molecular weight difference between PETA and PEO should also affect the surface composition with the lower molecular weight PETA segregating to the surface [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we obtained a surface which was completely wetted by hexadecane, corresponding to an interfacial energy of γ sl = 34 mJ/m 2 at room temperature. 6,13 For the lower interfacial energy substrate another identically cleaned silicon wafer was subsequently chemically coated with an OTS monolayer by immersing it in a solution of 50 g bicyclohexane, 2.8 g carbon tetrachloride, and 0.8 g OTS for 15 min and flushing afterward with chloroform to remove any cross-linked OTS chains. This procedure was repeated three times to ensure a fully covered substrate, and the resulting advancing contact angle of hexadecane was 40 • ± 2 • at 22 • C, 39 • ± 2 • at 40 • C, and 37.3 • ± 2 • at 60 • C. This corresponds to an interfacial energy of γ sl = 7.2 mJ/m 2 at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the surface treatments carried out in experiments is self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) coating with OTS, which is considered to have hydrophobic properties, and the other is UV-ozone treatment known as hydrophilic treatment [44,45]. In SAMs coating, the surface is modified via the formation of an organic molecule film spontaneously aligned on the surface [44,46]. In this experiment, the fabricated nano-micro hybrid patterns were coated by a vapor deposition technique using OTS (Sigma-Aldrich) in which a long hydrocarbon chain is bonded to trichlorosilane.…”
Section: Variation Of Wettability With Surface Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%