2003
DOI: 10.1021/ja020359i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Treatment of Silicon Carbide Using TiO2(IV) Photocatalyst

Abstract: Silicon carbide (SiC) and diamond were decomposed to CO(2)(g) by the photocatalysis with TiO(2) at room temperature, although the decomposition rate of diamond was very slow. According to the XPS spectra of Si2p on the SiC surface, SiO(2) was simultaneously formed on the surface by the TiO(2) photocatalysis. The thickness of the SiO(2) formed on the SiC surface during the photocatalytic oxidation for 1 h was estimated to be about 40 A from the depth profile of the XPS spectra using Ar etching. The SiC surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the discovery of photocatalytic water splitting by titania electrodes, [1] the surface chemistry of titania has been investigated extensively, often with the goals of improved properties for photocatalytic reactions, [2,3] sensor applications, and applications as a support for catalytic groups. [4][5][6] Numerous investigations of titania surfaces have been carried out with single crystals under ultrahigh vacuum conditions, typically with samples lacking hydroxyl groups; some investigations have focused on the defect sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the discovery of photocatalytic water splitting by titania electrodes, [1] the surface chemistry of titania has been investigated extensively, often with the goals of improved properties for photocatalytic reactions, [2,3] sensor applications, and applications as a support for catalytic groups. [4][5][6] Numerous investigations of titania surfaces have been carried out with single crystals under ultrahigh vacuum conditions, typically with samples lacking hydroxyl groups; some investigations have focused on the defect sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probe molecules O 2 , CO and CO 2 that have been used to characterize rutile (1 1 0) are weakly bound to the defect sites, being desorbed at temperatures well below ambient. Although anatase is known to be more reactive and have higher surface areas than rutile for several photocatalytic applications, [2,3,[9][10][11] there are still no reports of investigations of anatase surface defects with probe molecules. Our goal was to characterize the surface sites of anatase (prepared in a high-area porous form with surface hydroxyl groups) by a probe molecule of another class, one that would be rather strongly bound and offer spectroscopic signatures to help elucidate its interactions with the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the conduction band electron can react with adsorbed molecular oxygen forming superoxide radicals and subsequently hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 / However, the oxidizing potential of photocatalytic materials is not limited to their surface, as oxidizing species can diffuse away from the photocatalytic surface, inducing redox reactions in the bulk. This effect is usually called remote photocatalysis and is most likely mediated through hydrogen peroxide and singlet oxygen [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45] [46], [27]. However, in the case of remote photocatalysis, the reaction rate and thus the product yield is usually one or two orders of magnitude lower than that of the process occurring at the photocatalyst surface.…”
Section: Photocatalysis and Photocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the outer system contains only water, 83.5% of the RhB is kept within the membrane packaged-container and 16.5% of the RhB diffuses into the outer water after 1 h. However, when the outer system is a Fenton reagent, only 5% of the RhB remains in the container and no RhB is detected outside after 1 h, because · OH generated by the Fenton reagent can pass through the membrane and degrade RhB both inside and outside the container. It also can be seen that only H 2 O 2 is unable to degrade the RhB within 1 h. When employing water, TiO 2 , and UV light as the outer system, the percentage of RhB in the container declines to 56% after 1 h, which mainly results from the diffusion of reactive oxygen species such as · OH generated in the TiO 2 -mediated photocatalytic process (18,19). However, with water, Zn:In(OH) y S z -SSN, and VL as the outer system, the percentage of RhB in container shows no appreciable difference with that employing pure water as outer system, indicating that there is little entry of bulky · OH or · O 2 -through the membrane.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Mechanism(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%