“…The process involves adding some chemical agents to injected water to adjust the water/oil mobility ratio. − Among these agents, polymer can increase the viscosity of the displacing phase and reduce the permeability of the aqueous phase through appropriate adsorption and retention on the rock surface. ,− Thus, the polymer flooding can raise sweep efficiency observably, but it does nothing for displacement efficiency. On the contrary, surfactant flooding is able to lower the interfacial tension between oil and water and improve displacement efficiency effectively. ,, However, problems for surfactant flooding include low sweep efficiency, high cost, and excessive adsorption on the rock. − On the basis of the merits and shortages of polymer flooding and surfactant flooding, polymer/surfactant (SP) combinational flooding has been widely used in tertiary recovery. The technique promises both viscoelasticity and lower interfacial tension and can reduce the dosage of the surfactant. − Moreover, SP flooding overcomes the drawbacks of conventional alkali/polymer/surfactant (ASP) combination flooding technology, which involves reaction with divalent ions causing blockage of pipes, damage to equipment and impairment of the reservoir formation due to the addition of alkali. , …”