2018
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201801490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant‐driven Amphoteric Doping of Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: Aqueous surfactant dispersion is the most typical starting step to functionalize materials consisting of carbon nanotubes, but the effects of surfactants on the electronic properties are stillu nclear.H ere we report how the functional groups of surfactants affect the electronic properties of carbon nanotube films. Using spectroscopic and thermoelectric characterization, we demonstrate that anionic and non-ionic surfactants contribute to the formation of p-type and n-type carbonn anotubes, respectively.A dditi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the surfactant that resulted in the suppression of thermal conductivity while maintaining C-Dps coverage is responsible for the improvement of thermoelectric properties in the CNT yarn using method D. Since the dispersion of CNTs was not successful only with the surfactant in the spinning process (similar to method A), a combinational effect of hydrophobic ILs that disperse the CNT in the liquid phase and amphiphilic surfactant, which can prevent the reunion of CNT bundles during the exchange of IL with water, could be effective to keep CNTs untangled. On the other hand, because of this unintentional carrier doping by surfactant and air, the power factor and ZT obtained in this study may not be the maximum one. Doping control is, therefore, necessary in future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…As a result, the surfactant that resulted in the suppression of thermal conductivity while maintaining C-Dps coverage is responsible for the improvement of thermoelectric properties in the CNT yarn using method D. Since the dispersion of CNTs was not successful only with the surfactant in the spinning process (similar to method A), a combinational effect of hydrophobic ILs that disperse the CNT in the liquid phase and amphiphilic surfactant, which can prevent the reunion of CNT bundles during the exchange of IL with water, could be effective to keep CNTs untangled. On the other hand, because of this unintentional carrier doping by surfactant and air, the power factor and ZT obtained in this study may not be the maximum one. Doping control is, therefore, necessary in future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, weaker electron donors were used to achieve n-type characteristics from SWCNT films, including neutral surfactants (e.g. Pluronic PEG-type polymers, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)) [27], and simple electron-donating polymers (e.g. poly(vinyl alcohol) and poly(vinyl acetate)) [28].…”
Section: Electron Transfer-type Dopantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of surfactants to suspend SWCNTs has since expanded to include other anionic, cationic, and non-ionic surfactants (Hirsch, 2002; Wenseleers et al, 2004; Crochet et al, 2007; Haggenmueller et al, 2008; Blanch et al, 2010; Bergler et al, 2016; Nonoguchi et al, 2018), such as sodium cholate (SC), sodium deoxycholate (SDOC), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS), lithium dodecyl sulfate (LDS), Triton X-100, and pluronic F127. Depending on the surfactant, high-quality dispersions can be achieved with large populations of individualized nanotubes (Coleman, 2009) and SWCNT concentrations >1 mg/mL.…”
Section: Surfactant-coated Swcntsmentioning
confidence: 99%