1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.6037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant Scavenging and Surface Deposition by Rising Bubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We contend that high EFs at such wind speeds should not be unexpected because it has long been known that the SML reforms rapidly following physical disruption [ Dragcevic and Pravdic , ], something we later confirmed experimentally with respect to SA [ Cunliffe et al ., ]. It is now well established that rapid SML recovery occurs because SML organics dispersed by breaking waves readily reabsorb to the surfaces of rising bubbles generated by the same breaking waves [ Stefan and Szeri , ; Woolf , ], to be released back to the SML and or ejected to air via bubble bursting at the air‐sea interface. Consequently, our data strongly support the notion of an essentially self‐sustaining SML and we have no reason to suspect that this mechanism would cease to operate either at or beyond the maximum wind speeds we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We contend that high EFs at such wind speeds should not be unexpected because it has long been known that the SML reforms rapidly following physical disruption [ Dragcevic and Pravdic , ], something we later confirmed experimentally with respect to SA [ Cunliffe et al ., ]. It is now well established that rapid SML recovery occurs because SML organics dispersed by breaking waves readily reabsorb to the surfaces of rising bubbles generated by the same breaking waves [ Stefan and Szeri , ; Woolf , ], to be released back to the SML and or ejected to air via bubble bursting at the air‐sea interface. Consequently, our data strongly support the notion of an essentially self‐sustaining SML and we have no reason to suspect that this mechanism would cease to operate either at or beyond the maximum wind speeds we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both laboratory (Dragćević and Pravdić, 1981) and field (Williams et al, 1986) experiments, surface films appear to reform within seconds after disruption. In the presence of breaking waves, dispersed SML materials adsorb rapidly to the surface of the rising air bubbles, and therefore, bubble plumes may be the most important transport vector for surface-active material to the SML (Liss, 1975;Stefan and Szeri, 1999). When the bubble bursts at the sea-surface, only a fraction of attached organic matter is ejected into the air as aerosols, whereas the remainder is adsorbed on the surface to reform the SML (Liss, 1975).…”
Section: Evidence For Microlayer Enrichment At Higher Wind Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson and Cooke (1980) pointed out that the adsorption of surface-active compounds is selective, and compounds with higher surface activity have the highest potential to be scavenged and brought to the surface. Because even clean bubbles quickly become covered with surfactant while rising (Stefan and Szeri, 1999), globules of material may drop off the bottom of the bubbles, which could fractionate the material, leaving the most surface-active substances on the bubbles (GESAMP, 1995).…”
Section: Evidence For Microlayer Enrichment At Higher Wind Speedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be taken into account that the concentration of organic matter in the tank will evolve to a distribution characterized by the highest concentration near the water surface, as a result of the diffusion of surfactants to the air-water interface (Stefan and Szeri, 1999), thus, the shallow bubble plumes produced in our study spend their lifetime in the relevant region for organics adsorption. According to these results the differences observed between the different bubble-bursting mechanisms would not be related to the different bubble paths.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetics Of Marine Surfactants On Rising Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the higher number of bubbles generated by the 8 water jets system with respect to the spargers (estimated to be about double amount with respect to the glass frit) might explain the differences observed in the hygroscopicity and CCN measurements between the bubble-bursting systems. A higher number of bubbles imply more transport of organic matter to the water subsurface (Stefan and Szeri, 1999), which would lead to higher local organic concentration near the bubble bursting region and, hence, to higher particle organic enrichment. Further work with the same system and different bubble production should be conducted in order to clarify this aspect.…”
Section: Adsorption Kinetics Of Marine Surfactants On Rising Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%