Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Context-Aware Systems and Applications 2015
DOI: 10.4108/icst.iccasa.2014.257255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SURFtogether: Towards Context Proximity Detection Using Visual Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We perform our co-presence detection for the best encounter times of 55 different parameter sets, including proximity verification sets, sensor data, user groups, and device groups. We use multiple proximity periods ∈ [5,10,15,20,25,30] min to evaluate the time granularity of user's co-presence. To verify the user's proximity, two user devices have to encounter the same wireless device, e.g., access point or BLE beacon, within the proximity time window.…”
Section: B Results Of Co-presence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We perform our co-presence detection for the best encounter times of 55 different parameter sets, including proximity verification sets, sensor data, user groups, and device groups. We use multiple proximity periods ∈ [5,10,15,20,25,30] min to evaluate the time granularity of user's co-presence. To verify the user's proximity, two user devices have to encounter the same wireless device, e.g., access point or BLE beacon, within the proximity time window.…”
Section: B Results Of Co-presence Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work can be positioned within the field of proximity detection or co-presence detection (used interchangeably in this paper). A number of approaches have been proposed for co-presence detection using the similarity of Bluetooth signals [7], Wi-Fi signals [8], ambient sound [9], images [10], and accelerometer data [11]. Some works concentrate on the estimation of face-to-face interaction among users up to 1.5 m using Bluetooth signals [12], proximity sensors [13], or comparing magnetometer readings to link devices in close proximity of a few centimeters [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%