2015
DOI: 10.1177/1753193414566566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical adhesive BioGlue™ does not benefit tendon repair strength: an ex vivo study

Abstract: n/a.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, investigators continue to explore different methods, which include the use of bio-glue, barbed sutures, vein grafts, etc., to further enhance repair performance by attempting to improve gap forces, minimize repair bulk, etc. (Jordan et al, 2015; Joyce et al, 2014; Peltz et al, 2014; Rodger et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, investigators continue to explore different methods, which include the use of bio-glue, barbed sutures, vein grafts, etc., to further enhance repair performance by attempting to improve gap forces, minimize repair bulk, etc. (Jordan et al, 2015; Joyce et al, 2014; Peltz et al, 2014; Rodger et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wrapping repaired tendons with bioadhesive film increased tensile stiffness, failure load, and energy to failure in comparison with suture alone group [131]. In contrast, ex vivo application of bioadhesives (BioGlue ® ) on suture repaired flexor tendons failed to improve tensile properties [130]. When bioadhesives were applied to sutures instead of tendons, repaired tendons with bioadhesives-coated sutures increased the tensile properties of repaired tendon likely attributed to shear lag effect [132].…”
Section: Tendonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The primary treatment option for tendon rupture is suture-repair, and various suture techniques are being implemented depending on types of tendon and injuries. Unfortunately, the rate of tendon re-rupture is high because repaired tendons hardly recover the original mechanical strength [130]. Few bioadhesive materials have been investigated to enhance the success rate of suture-repair, consequently reducing the re-tear rate [90].…”
Section: Tendonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting evidence shows the benefits of tissue adhesives alone or as an ancillary method to suturing, but the healing outcomes remain limited. [ 347,348 ] A reason for the unsatisfactory results is the mechanical mismatch between the implantable adhesives and the target tissues. For instance, fibrin glues used in previous studies were much softer and more brittle than the musculoskeletal tissues.…”
Section: Emerging Applications Of Tissue Adhesivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10 ] Due to the lack of mechanical strength, commercialized tissue adhesives such as fibrin glues and Bioglue suffer from limited outcomes in repairing tendon. [ 347,348 ] The mismatch of mechanical properties is a major constraint that disqualifies tissue adhesives as a stand‐alone repair technique to replace suturing. Another mechanical concern is about the loss of adhesion under cyclic loading, i.e., interfacial fatigue fracture.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%