2001
DOI: 10.1177/014107680109400508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Decisions in the Elderly: The Importance of Biological Age

Abstract: Surgeons will sometimes advise against an operation because the patient is 'old and frail'. A simple starring system (one to five), based on performance and lifestyle, has been devised to assess the biological age of elderly patients. 10 consultant surgeons and 10 trainees answered questions about their treatment recommendations for hypothetical patients of standard age and medical history but with various star ratings and surgical conditions. 1000 decisions were available for analysis. The four and five star … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision for DHC in our patients was made on an individual basis, taking account of the biological age of patients rather than of the date of birth. This approach is in line with findings on the importance of the biological age especially in surgical decisions [16] . Individual clinical decision-making is also reflected in the proportion of patients without impaired consciousness (16.7%) or with a time interval of more than 48 h from the index event (21.7%) at the time the decision for DHC was made.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decision for DHC in our patients was made on an individual basis, taking account of the biological age of patients rather than of the date of birth. This approach is in line with findings on the importance of the biological age especially in surgical decisions [16] . Individual clinical decision-making is also reflected in the proportion of patients without impaired consciousness (16.7%) or with a time interval of more than 48 h from the index event (21.7%) at the time the decision for DHC was made.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The decision for DHC was made on an individual basis, referring to accepted criteria as defined in the DESTINY trial [6] . However, 16.7% of all patients had no impaired consciousness and 21.7% of all patients underwent DHC >48 h after suspected onset ( fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is our strong view that neither age alone nor subjective rating systems (12,13) can determine the appropriateness of surgical intervention in the individual elderly patient. However, the place of palliative treatment must remain a major consideration for nonagenarians with significant comorbidity and/or severe surgical illness (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opinion is usually that the patient looks well for his age or looks fragile for his age. 3 However, this assessment may not be a sufficient valuation of surgical risk. Instead, the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (P-POSSUM) score may be calculated.…”
Section: Calculation Of Nutritional Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Because of the above factors, age is considered a nonmodifiable risk factor involving surgical outcome. This statement is modulated by the effect of physiologic age versus chronologic age, 3 which is often expressed in clinical practice as the perceived condition of the patient with respect to what the clinician would expect for their specific biological age. Objective measures exist for biological age, such as the concept of frailty, 4 which has been defined recently as the presence of 4 of 6 of the following factors associated with the prediction of 6-month mortality: Mini-Cog score of 3 or less, albumin level of 3.3 mg/dL or less, more than 1 fall in the last 6 months, hematocrit level less than 35%, dependency with at least one activity of daily living, and the presence of at least 3 comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%