“…Thirty-two articles were not original research papers (narrative reviews, case reports or editorial letters) [10,. Eighteen articles reported adult or mixed adult and pediatric population without a separate analysis [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Sixteen articles had flaws that disqualified them from inclusion (sampling, diagnostic definition, incomplete follow up, and non-objective assessment of final outcome) [2,4,[6][7][8]14,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76].…”