2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in treatment of Class II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result of low prediction accuracy for the lower lip region is reported by Pektas et al [11]. Conversely, two articles affirmed that the statistical differences between Dolphin soft tissue prediction and the real outcome of the patient did not invalidate the software prediction, as it was close to real surgical results [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar result of low prediction accuracy for the lower lip region is reported by Pektas et al [11]. Conversely, two articles affirmed that the statistical differences between Dolphin soft tissue prediction and the real outcome of the patient did not invalidate the software prediction, as it was close to real surgical results [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In both groups, surgeries have been more extensive than planned; facial convexity and the distance between the lips and the cranial base presented similar values between t2 and t3. The conclusion of the authors was that statistical differences in the considered measurements did not invalidate surgical prediction performed with the software, because forecasted changes were sufficiently close to of the surgical outcomes [12]. Lira et al followed the same approach of the previous article on two groups of patients; the former underwent Le Fort I without segmental surgery, while on the latter, in addition to LFI surgery, mandibular setback was performed with an SSRO.…”
Section: Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have suggested that there were significant individual variations for the changes in the soft tissue following the extraction treatment because of many influencing factors, such as soft tissue thickness, soft tissue areas, the underlying skeletal patterns [7], the soft tissue remodeling during orthodontic treatment and the strain of soft tissue upon the anterior teeth. Though it is now possible to simulate soft tissue changes for patients with dental protrusion and extraction treatment by using some visual treatment objective (VTO) software, it is still difficult to accurately predict the soft tissue changes in the chin area following the orthodontic incisor retraction [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few years, there has been an enormous demand for orthodontic-surgical treatment seeking to correct the most varied types of skeletal malocclusions (6). The increasing demand for this treatment modality is related to both the quest for dental and facial harmony (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%