2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical preference regarding different materials for custom-made allograft cranioplasty in patients with calvarial defects: Results from an internal audit covering the last 20 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, causes of the initial pathology resemble the common ones in the literature ( 21 , 22 ): trauma (60%), tumors (10.8%), vascular (9.2%), malformations (9.2%), infections (3.1%), and others (7.7%). The overall complication rate (16.9%) is similar to what was reported by Klieverik ( 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Also, causes of the initial pathology resemble the common ones in the literature ( 21 , 22 ): trauma (60%), tumors (10.8%), vascular (9.2%), malformations (9.2%), infections (3.1%), and others (7.7%). The overall complication rate (16.9%) is similar to what was reported by Klieverik ( 7 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Most studies described the use of bone substitutes in implant dentistry for alveolar ridge augmentation and not for restoration or large maxillary oncological defects. Thus, the presented case could be better compared with other craniofacial reconstructive procedures, such as neurosurgical cranioplasty that provides several examples of grafting procedure using bone substitutes [ 22 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, equine-derived bone grafts have not been documented in published literature and could be considered for further clinical trials, as it has demonstrated optimal outcomes even in orthopedics [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a vast range of methods and materials significantly enlarge surgeons’ artillery. To cover the cranial defects, there is a choice of allografts, autografts, xenografts, or other bone substitutes [ 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 ]. Cranioplasty with the use of bone, derived from decompressive surgery from the same patient via allograft, is often associated with bone resorption, auto-immunologic reactions and a high infection risk [ 108 , 109 ], and is often not feasible due to skull fractures.…”
Section: Cranioplastymentioning
confidence: 99%