Objectives To report the outcome of managing urethrocutaneous ®stula after hypospadias repair over 10 years. Patients and methods Forty-seven patients (mean age 7.6 years, range 2±18) underwent repair of 57 urethrocutaneous ®stulae after hypospadias surgery.The ®stula was single in 37 patients and multiple in 10; 42 ®stulae were small (<4 mm) and 15 large (>4 mm). Twenty-one ®stulae were at the corona, 15 at the anterior shaft, 16 at the mid-shaft and ®ve were penoscrotal. The interval between primary hypospadias repair and the ®rst attempt at ®stula repair was 6±12 months. Small ®stulae were repaired using a multilayer simple closure technique, and large ®stulae repaired using rotational and advancement skin¯aps. Suprapubic urinary diversion was used in all patients with large ®stulae or small multiple ®stulae (25 patients); an overnight urethral catheter was used in the remaining patients. Results Simple closure was successful in 30 of 42 small ®stulae (71%); eight were successfully closed by secondary closure, while four needed a third closure. Rotational and advancement skin¯aps were successful in 13 of 15 large ®stulae; one required secondary¯ap repair and one was closed simply. Most recurrences (78%) were of coronal ®stulae; there was recurrence in four of 25 (16%) patients in whom suprapubic diversion was used, in contrast to 10 of 22 (45%) with no suprapubic diversion. Conclusions Although simple closure of a ®stula is easy and not time-consuming it is followed by a signi®-cantly higher rate of recurrence than when skin aps are used. Rotational and advancement¯aps are the optimal methods for repairing ®stulae after hypospadias, particularly for large and coronal ®stulae. Thus, the appropriate indication for simple closure is small ®stulae at the penile shaft. Suprapubic diversion is important in those with large or multiple ®stulae.