Surgimiento y desarrollo del método Delphi: una perspectiva cienciométrica

Ramírez, Miguel Cruz; Vásquez, José Alberto Rúa

doi:10.5195/biblios.2018.470

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The contributions of the groups are submitted to a Delphi study. A systematic forecasting technique for gathering information from subject matter experts and reaching consensus (Cruz Ramírez & Rúa Vásquez, 2018;López-Gómez, 2017;Rowe & Wright, 1999).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Learning about Sustainability in Students with Down Syndrome

Barcenilla,

González,

Manzanares

et al. 2023

IJLTER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessment is an essential resource for guaranteeing quality education. In order for it to be effective, it must be continuous, formative and adapted to the characteristics of the individual student, so that it shows their abilities. Students with Down Syndrome benefit from these aspects, as they can demonstrate their achievements and difficulties in different ways. This article analyses these approaches and brings together the suggestions of 14 experts, in the field of education for students with Down Syndrome, from three different countries, 5 members of Belgium and Spain, and 4 members of Ireland. Through the instrumental case study and focus discussions of the experts, using the Delphi method, a series of basic aspects are established on the most appropriate methods and evaluation tools for the target group. In the analysis the experts agreed on three key aspects (with scores of three out of three): maintaining high expectations of students' potential, encouraging self-evaluation, and enabling students controlling their own learning process. The group of experts proposes the use of a learning register or portfolio as a method of assessment for students with Down Syndrome.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Learning about Sustainability in Students with Down Syndrome

Barcenilla,

González,

Manzanares

et al. 2023

IJLTER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Para ello se ha utilizado el procedimiento habitual (Aponte al., 2010;Landeta 1999;Linstone y Turoff, 1975), en el que se ha distribuido un cuestionario, se ha obtenido la respuesta de los expertos, se han analizado estadísticamente las respuestas y se ha devuelto el resultado del análisis tantas veces como ha sido necesario hasta obtener el consenso de los participantes respecto a la calidad de los ítems que forman el instrumento. Esta técnica no es nueva, pero su valor metodológico sigue vigente en la actualidad (Cabero e Infante, 2014) y ha sido aplicada en una gran cantidad y heterogeneidad de trabajos publicados (Cruz y Rúa, 2018). Se considera una técnica adecuada para procesos cuyo objetivo es la validación de instrumentos, ya que permite obtener información de un grupo de expertos, organizar dicha información para su análisis, seleccionarla en base a las estimaciones y reformularla siguiendo las sugerencias de los desarrollo y validación de la escala de planificación centrada en la persona (e-pcp) (Bakieva, et al, 2018;George y Trujillo, 2018;López-de-Arana et al, 2020;Martín, 2018).…”

Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified

Desarrollo y validación de la escala de planificación centrada en la persona (E-PCP)

Rodríguez

García

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En los últimos años se ha investigado mucho sobre la aplicación y los efectos de la Planificación Centrada en la Persona (PCP), pero no se han encontrado instrumentos estandarizados adaptados al contexto español para hacerlo de forma rigurosa. Este estudio busca diseñar y validar la Escala de Planificación Centrada en la Persona (E-PCP) con el fin de ofrecer un instrumento válido y fiable que permita hacerlo. Para su diseño y validación de contenido se ha utilizado la revisión bibliográfica y se ha aplicado la técnica Delphi. La escala resultante se ha aplicado a una muestra de 102 profesionales que trabajan en centros de atención a personas con discapacidad intelectual en Asturias, lo que ha permitido el análisis de sus propiedades psicométricas. Para analizar la validez de constructo se ha realizado una validación cruzada mediante análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC). Los resultados ofrecen una escala con una buena fiabilidad (α = ,96), que explica el 58 % de la varianza, y con una estructura unifactorial integrada por 16 ítems. Su brevedad, fiabilidad y validez indican que este instrumento puede ser de utilidad para la investigación y la práctica profesional.

show abstract

“…Once the instrument was built, it was validated by a group of seven experts (two bacteriologists, two nurses, one psychologist, one sociologist, and one statistician) -who knewabouttuberculosisandhaveworkedinthisfield-using the Delphi method. This method is a structured and multi-stage process with an expert panel invited to participate in a series of rounds to identify, clarify and achieve consensus on a particular topic [10][11][12] . The selected health specialties experts hold a higher education training (Masters).…”

Section: Pilot Testmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of an instrument to comply with institutional measures on tuberculosis infection control

Rojas

García‐Perdomo

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess an instrument’s psychometric properties to evaluate compliance with institutional tuberculosis infection control measures of Healthcare Providers in the city of Cali. Methods: A cross-sectional study (psychometric type, instrument validation). The development of instrument considered sections from the Guidelines for the preventing of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health care settings (CDC), Guidelines for implementation of infection control of tuberculosis in the Americas and Evaluation Control Tools for Hospital-Acquired Infections. The construction of final instrument was carried out with the support of seven experts according to Delphi method, obtaining an instrument comprising three domains and a final number of 65 questions; each item was evaluated, usefulness, format, and validity of the instrument. Contents were assessed with the Aiken coefficient and reliability with Bangdiwala concordance coefficient. R version 3.2.0 application was used. Results: The instrument was made up by 65 items referring to questions regarding administrative, environmental and respiratory measures. It holds acceptable psychometric properties, including good internal structure and suitable reliability. Conclusions: A valid and reliable instrument was obtained to evaluate compliance with institutional measures on tuberculosis infection control in Healthcare Institutions in the city of Cali. Key Words: Tuberculosis; Validation Studies; Delphi Technique. RESUMEN Objetivo: El estudio tuvo como objetivo construir y establecer las propiedades psicométricas de un instrumento para evaluar el cumplimiento de las medidas institucionales de control de infecciones para la tuberculosis en las Instituciones Prestadoras de Salud de la ciudad de Cali. Métodos: El estudio fue de corte transversal (tipo psicométrico, validación de un instrumento). El desarrollo del instrumento consideró secciones de las Guidelines for the preventing of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health care settings (CDC), Guidelines for implementation of infecti

show abstract

Surgimiento y desarrollo del método Delphi: una perspectiva cienciométrica

Cited by 12 publications

References 25 publications

Assessment of Learning about Sustainability in Students with Down Syndrome

Assessment of Learning about Sustainability in Students with Down Syndrome

Desarrollo y validación de la escala de planificación centrada en la persona (E-PCP)

Validation of an instrument to comply with institutional measures on tuberculosis infection control

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About