2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surplus food donation: Effectiveness, carbon footprint, and rebound effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to many studies [10,12,13], the results of this article cannot fully agree with the prioritization of food-waste-reduction measures as dictated by the waste hierarchy. While some products positively affect the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions or at least not releasing additional greenhouse gas emissions compared with current waste-management measure (use as animal feed or anaerobic digestion), the disposable tableware had a negative environmental impact, meaning that additional emissions are caused by the sale of the product.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to many studies [10,12,13], the results of this article cannot fully agree with the prioritization of food-waste-reduction measures as dictated by the waste hierarchy. While some products positively affect the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions or at least not releasing additional greenhouse gas emissions compared with current waste-management measure (use as animal feed or anaerobic digestion), the disposable tableware had a negative environmental impact, meaning that additional emissions are caused by the sale of the product.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, upcycled products should be seen as an extension of the product range at the retail level. For consumers (downstream stage), Sundin et al (2022) found a substantial rebound effect associated with re-spending substitution-related monetary savings due to food donation, offsetting 51% of the potential carbon-emissions savings [13]. As upcycled products are usually more expensive than their alternatives, the respective negative effects should not be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Food donation is one of the most significant measures to solve today’s food waste (Busetti, 2019 ; Kinach et al, 2020 ; Sundin et al, 2022 ). Developed countries such as Europe and the USA have comprehensive laws on food donation, and explicit provisions for possible disputes and liabilities (Eriksson et al, 2015 ; González-Torre & Coque, 2016 ; Vlaholias et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, authors suggest government to finance the relevant infrastructure for recycling disposed products and consumers' education for shifting towards responsible consumption including earlier food donation. Similarly, Sundin et al [23] prove the environmental feasibility of food donation calculating a double of the benefit comparing to anaerobic digestion. Kumar and Dholakia [24] see the huge role of the firms to change consumers' behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%