2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate Decision Making in the Case of a Pregnant Woman Newly Disabled With Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,20,26 Such cases highlight important ethical issues, including prioritization of fetal wellbeing over the potential harms to the mother and the need for maternal surrogate decision making. 27 When interpreting our results, we note that all of the included publications were of low quality with a high likelihood of reporting bias which may provide a biased view of the management and outcomes after maternal neurotrauma. In addition, no nonpregnant control group exists for comparison of management interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,20,26 Such cases highlight important ethical issues, including prioritization of fetal wellbeing over the potential harms to the mother and the need for maternal surrogate decision making. 27 When interpreting our results, we note that all of the included publications were of low quality with a high likelihood of reporting bias which may provide a biased view of the management and outcomes after maternal neurotrauma. In addition, no nonpregnant control group exists for comparison of management interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Multiple cases focused on aggressive ICP and medical management in the intensive care unit of parturients in a persistent vegetative state to achieve fetal viability and a successful neonatal outcome 14,20,26. Such cases highlight important ethical issues, including prioritization of fetal well-being over the potential harms to the mother and the need for maternal surrogate decision making 27. When interpreting our results, we note that all of the included publications were of low quality with a high likelihood of reporting bias which may provide a biased view of the management and outcomes after maternal neurotrauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%