“…a mean group size of 3.6 individuals for 9 groups, is closely comparable to other studies conducted in different parts of the H. hoolock distribution range, as reported in Kumar et al [2009], i.e. 3.2 individuals for 24 groups and 3.4 for 7 groups [Tilson, 1979], 3.1 for 8 groups and 3.0 for 14 groups [Choudhury, 1990[Choudhury, , 1991 in Assam, 3-3.2 for 6-10 groups [Mukherjee, 1982], 2.1 for 34 groups [Gupta, 1994] in Tripura, 3.0 individuals for 42 groups [Alfred and Sati, 1990] in Meghalaya, 3.5 for 6 groups [Gittins and Tilson, 1984], 2.3 for 5 groups and 2.9 for 15 groups [Ahsan, 1984[Ahsan, , 1994, and 2.9 for 13 groups [Feeroz and Islam, 1992] in Bangladesh ( table 2 ).…”