2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-006-0195-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Hylobates agilis albibarbis in a logged peat-swamp forest: Sabangau catchment, Central Kalimantan

Abstract: Few data are available on gibbon populations in peat-swamp forest. In order to assess the importance of this habitat for gibbon conservation, a population of Hylobates agilis albibarbis was surveyed in the Sabangau peat-swamp forest, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. This is an area of about 5,500 km(2) of selectively logged peat-swamp forest, which was formally gazetted as a national park during 2005. The study was conducted during June and July 2004 using auditory sampling methods. Five sample areas were select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gibbon density was estimated using fixed-point counts, as described by Brockelman & Ali (1987) and following the protocol described by Buckley et al (2006), Cheyne et al (2008) and Hamard et al (2010). therland 2000).…”
Section: Analysis Of Density Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gibbon density was estimated using fixed-point counts, as described by Brockelman & Ali (1987) and following the protocol described by Buckley et al (2006), Cheyne et al (2008) and Hamard et al (2010). therland 2000).…”
Section: Analysis Of Density Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, encounters with gibbon groups prior to habituation were used (data from November 2004-June 2005). We obtained a mean group size of 4.05, whereas Buckley et al (2006) reported a mean group size of 3.4, although they recognise that individuals may have been missed, as the gibbons were unhabituated at the time of their study. Lone animals (whose singing is not very predictable) were not included in the quadrangulation analysis, but lone animals sighted by gibbon behaviour teams were included in density calculations.…”
Section: Home-ranging Sizementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Average home-range size for the MSF is calculated as 53 ha [compared with 47 ha reported by Buckley et al (2006)]. This difference in home-range size is not significant and can be attributed to the fact that they found seven more groups in the study area.…”
Section: Home-ranging Sizementioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations