2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0300.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey Data and the Interest Rate Sensitivity of US Bank Stock Returns

Abstract: In this paper, we provide empirical evidence on the interest rate sensitivity of the stock returns of the twenty largest US bank holding companies. The main contribution of the paper is the use of survey data to model the unexpected interest rate variable, which is an alternative approach to the existing literature. We ®nd evidence of signi®cant negative interest rate sensitivity during the early 1980s, and evidence of declining signi®cance in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This result is also obtained when u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with the banks' motivation and pattern of engaging in off‐balance‐sheet instruments during 1984–1991 (Jagtiani, Saunders, and Udell, 1995). The insignificant coefficients for this period are in line with the results of Benink and Wolff (2000) who employ survey data.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with the banks' motivation and pattern of engaging in off‐balance‐sheet instruments during 1984–1991 (Jagtiani, Saunders, and Udell, 1995). The insignificant coefficients for this period are in line with the results of Benink and Wolff (2000) who employ survey data.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…19 An 18 A thorough exposition of the quantitative aspects of financial risk management can be found in Dowd (1998). 19 Robinson (1995) finds that the yield effect is greater in the post-Basel period, but no explanation is provided (in contrast to Allen and Jagtiani, 1997;Benink and Wolff, 2000). One could argue that banks have changed their asset-liability structures and become more sensitive possibly due to a risk substitution policy.…”
Section: Interest Rate Risk and Market Realitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benink and Wolff (2000) provide empirical evidence on the interest rate sensitivity of the stock returns of the 20 largest US bank holding companies. The main contribution of the paper is the use of survey data and the forecast errors of ARIMA processes to model the unexpected movement in interest rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, bank stock returns tend to exhibit more sensitivity to changes in long-term interest rates than to changes in short-term rates (Elyasiani and Mansur, 1998;Bartram, 2002;Saporoschenko, 2002;Czaja et al, 2009). Third, the interest rate sensitivity of stock returns of banks has declined over time mainly due to the increased availability of more advanced tools for measuring and managing IRR (Faff and Howard, 1999;Benink and Wolff, 2000;Ryan and Worthington, 2004;Joseph and Vezos, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, Hallerbach (1994) Following a usual practice in the literature (Flannery and James, 1984;Hirtle, 1997;Benink and Wolff, 2000;Soto et al, 2005;Ferrer et al, 2010), weekly stock returns, adjusted for dividends and stock splits, are employed. The weekly returns are calculated from Wednesday to Wednesday using closing stock prices in order to prevent the possible bias associated to the weekend effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%