2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-018-1036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey for major viruses in commercial Vitis vinifera wine grapes in Ontario

Abstract: BackgroundIn recent years, the Ontario grape and wine industry has experienced outbreaks of viral diseases across the province. Little is known about the prevalence of viruses and viral diseases in Ontario. Since 2015, we have conducted large-scale surveys for major viruses in commercial wine grapes in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and severity of viral diseases in Ontario.MethodsA total of 657 composite leaf samples representing 3285 vines collected from 137 vine blocks of 33… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FPST assay yielded C T values ranging from 17.4 to 30 (mean of 21.2) from GLRaV-3-positive samples, with an high efficiency (110.91%), as calculated from the standard curve. In the few cases (18 samples) where high C T values (35.5 to 39.5) were detected (S5 Table), samples were re-tested by the FPST assay and end-point RT-PCR (for details about this assay see [29]), and confirmed to be negative. We hypothesize that this amplification was caused by cross-contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPST assay yielded C T values ranging from 17.4 to 30 (mean of 21.2) from GLRaV-3-positive samples, with an high efficiency (110.91%), as calculated from the standard curve. In the few cases (18 samples) where high C T values (35.5 to 39.5) were detected (S5 Table), samples were re-tested by the FPST assay and end-point RT-PCR (for details about this assay see [29]), and confirmed to be negative. We hypothesize that this amplification was caused by cross-contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Poojari et al conducted studies on the incidence of GLR and GRBV in BC [ 16 , 17 ] and surveyed for GLR, GFL, GRBV, Grapevine pinot gris virus (GPG) in NS vineyards in V. vinifera and Vitis interspecific hybrids [ 13 ]. In addition, GLR-3 and GRBV were observed in ON vineyards by Xiao et al [ 18 ] in a study aiming at improving methods to detect viruses for use in diagnostics. However, such studies have not been done in QC since 1996 [ 15 ], although concerns were raised by viticulturists as the industry expanded by more than 300% from 2003 to 2018, i.e., from 225 ha to 718 ha [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, the most damaging virus strains are listed in the classification of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO 2019). The most widespread are Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1, 2 and 3 (GLRaV-1, GLRaV-2 and GLRaV-3), Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), Grapevine fleck virus (GFkV) and Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) (Vončina et al 2017, Xiao et al 2018. According to the propositions of EPPO, certified virus-free vines should be free of these 5 viruses: ArMV, GFLV, GL-RaV-1, GLRaV-3 and GFkV (only rootstocks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%